Seven Days of Sex... Woo Hoo!! :)

[Rhoni]

Originally Posted by aak1972

That still does not answer the question about OS and AS.

It has been answered many times. Both OS & AS are all right between two married [male & female couple] people as long as both are willing and enjoy it. The Marriage bed is undefiled.

IS that specific enough for you?

Blessings, Rhoni

[aak1972]

Originally Posted by Rhoni

It has been answered many times. Both OS & AS are all right between two married [male & female couple] people as long as both are willing and enjoy it. The Marriage bed is undefiled.

IS that specific enough for you?

Blessings, Rhoni

Well no need to get an attitude dear. I along with thousands of people here in the south of all denominations have been taught this was wrong. I have read and studied and I agree with you. But I try hard to undersatnd every ones point. You can always learn something.

[Neck]

Originally Posted by aak1972

Well no need to get an attitude dear. I along with thousands of people here in the south of all denominations have been taught this was wrong. I have read and studied and I agree with you. But I try hard to undersatnd every ones point. You can always learn something.

************************************************** *

Is an act between a husband and wife wrong?

If the motive is wrong the act is wrong.

regardless of the act.

Sexual expression is an outward expression of the respect and desire you have for your spouse.

A spouse really knows what is acceptable to their partner.

Regardless of the spoken acceptance of an act.

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by Neck

************************************************** *

Is an act between a husband and wife wrong?

If the motive is wrong the act is wrong.

regardless of the act.

Sexual expression is an outward expression of the respect and desire you have for your spouse.

A spouse really knows what is acceptable to their partner.

Regardless of the spoken acceptance of an act.

Exactly! If you are open and discuss with your spouse like you've been saying, then there shouldn't ever be any surprises.

However, if one of the partners feels something is dirty or defiles then that's where the respect should kick in and refrain from that. But, this needs to be handled by talking it out too - the influences from their past can influence right and wrong how they may feel about something. After discussing and they still feel the same way, then don't do it.

Respect and communication is BIG here - - Neck has laid it all out!

[ILG]

Originally Posted by Neck

************************************************** *

Is an act between a husband and wife wrong?

If the motive is wrong the act is wrong.

regardless of the act.

Sexual expression is an outward expression of the respect and desire you have for your spouse.

A spouse really knows what is acceptable to their partner.

Regardless of the spoken acceptance of an act.

Here is the answer to all the questions for this whole thread.

[aak1972]

Originally Posted by Neck

************************************************** *

Is an act between a husband and wife wrong?

If the motive is wrong the act is wrong.

regardless of the act.

Sexual expression is an outward expression of the respect and desire you have for your spouse.

A spouse really knows what is acceptable to their partner.

Regardless of the spoken acceptance of an act.

My question is this and its only question. Do you believe sodomy is a sin? And if you do which definition are you going by? Some on here believe sodomy is an act between same sex and/or unmarrieds. If that is the case why mention sodomy as a sin woulndt it be covered under homosexuality fornication and adultry. If its the websters definition well then OS AS and bestiality is a sin. People keep saying as long as it is agreed between husband and wife then its ok. Where is the line of sin drawn between married couples? Acts, positions, objects, or other people?

[Neck]

Originally Posted by aak1972

My question is this and its only question. Do you believe sodomy is a sin? And if you do which definition are you going by? Some on here believe sodomy is an act between same sex and/or unmarrieds. If that is the case why mention sodomy as a sin woulndt it be covered under homosexuality fornication and adultry. If its the websters definition well then OS AS and bestiality is a sin. People keep saying as long as it is agreed between husband and wife then its ok. Where is the line of sin drawn between married couples? Acts, positions, objects, or other people?

************************************************** *

Why the fetish hold on Sodomy?

If you are performing an act outside the mutual respect and love of your spouse, then the act is wrong.

I would state my entire position as discussed in this thread.

Ask yourself do both partners experience fulfillment within just those acts?

The ultimate expression of physical intimacy is for a man and a woman to be joined together in expression.

If AS, OS is the ultimate expression that fills your mind.

Your expression is a one-way selfish act of expression.

It you have the ability to continue into the acts of expression that please your spouse.

Then you have shared intimate expression.

[aak1972]

Originally Posted by Neck

************************************************** *

Why the fetish hold on Sodomy?

If you are performing an act outside the mutual respect and love of your spouse, then the act is wrong.

I would state my entire position on AS and OS or sodomy as discussed in this thread.

Ask yourself do both partners experience fulfillment within just those acts?

The ultimate expression of physical intimacy is for a man and a woman to be joined together in expression.

If AS, OS or sodomy is the ultimate expression that fills your mind.

Your expression is a one-way selfish act of expression.

It you have the ability to continue into the acts of expression that please your spouse.

Then you have shared intimate expression.

If you roll over after AS, OS or sodemy then you have defiled your relationship...

You must be a politician b/c you still havent given a direct answer. And for as a fetish hold on sodomy I will answer that gladly when you give me your definition. You are seemingly an intelligent person and very full of words but I notice you dont really say yes or no.

[Rhoni]

Originally Posted by aak1972

You must be a politician b/c you still havent given a direct answer. And for as a fetish hold on sodomy I will answer that gladly when you give me your definition. You are seemingly an intelligent person and very full of words but I notice you dont really say yes or no.

Me thinks thou needeth to change thy subject

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by aak1972

You must be a politician b/c you still havent given a direct answer. And for as a fetish hold on sodomy I will answer that gladly when you give me your definition. You are seemingly an intelligent person and very full of words but I notice you dont really say yes or no.

I see the answer in his post clearly.