Quote:
Originally Posted by 1399
The "Hate Crime" idea addresses the motivation behind the act.
"Premeditated Murder" carries a harsher penalty than "Manslaughter"-- both have the same unfortunate result.
The same argument holds true for "Hate Crimes".
|
I realized that already, but I don't agree with it. If it were for the purpose of curtailing these sort of acts that is one thing, but they don't. Laws against criminal acts don't really curtail criminal acts.
This 'was' in my opinion more of the government saying "we feel your pain" than anything. It is the same mindset behind legalizing gay marriages. It's to get the government to do something as offical recognition that really does nothing at all. Gays can already be married in civil unions and religious ceremonies. They want the GOVERNMENT to officially recognize them.
If any criminal truly had LOVE they would not commit crimes that hurt others. Thus all murders are hate crimes.
If someone kills your kid for their sneakers the government says "he is not as important as the "special group" that got killed for being that special group.
I mean that is pretty dumb...let's punish this guy more because we believe when he acted he did it with hate....duh! If a white person kills another white person because he hated that white person it's not a HATE crime according to the definition of the word. It's ONLY a hate crime if a white person kills a black person because he hates black (just one example)...that is again the government being forced to redefine something...in this case HATE.
This is the same mentality that spawns HATEFUL rhetoric by the marxist left leaning bigots that if YOU want to curtail illegal immigration into this nation it is because you are a racist hatemonger.