Re: Hillary Constitutionally barred from Sec. of S
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson
Regardless of the "reason", the precedent has already been set. In 1909, a Senator was appointed as Attorney General. The salary increase was temporarily reduced in order to accomodate the Presicent's appointee.
This is really not a big deal-- they just need to adjust her pay.
The big deal would be if the Senate ignores this inconvenient truth. After all, they are the ones to confirm or deny the President's Appointments.
You have a reference for that? The first I know of was in 1973, and it is clear in retrospect that Nixon had no regard for the laws.
__________________
"Beware lest you lose the substance by grasping at the shadow." ~Aesop