Don't you miss the days of Pres. BC?

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Truthseeker

I think you got a point there, but then why are abortion folks so worried when a republican appoints a SJ???


http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/04/18/sc...ion/index.html

Some felt this could lead to a roe vs wade reversal.

LOL

That's the Democrat's game. The Republicans capture your vote by pretending to be Pro-Life, the Democrats capture a lot of the women's votes by playing on the Republican game and scaring them into thinking Republicans will overturn Roe. It's all a BIG GAME.

[Truthseeker]

Originally Posted by Aquila

LOL

That's the Democrat's game. The Republicans capture your vote by pretending to be Pro-Life, the Democrats capture a lot of the women's votes by playing on the Republican game and scaring them into thinking Republicans will overturn Roe. It's all a BIG GAME.

I think you might be on to something there, we all being played to some degree.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Truthseeker

I think you might be on to something there, we all being played to some degree.

That's my point bro. Every culture down through history has had to deal with abortion in some way or another. None have successfully prevented, regulated, policed, or stopped it. It's just something outside of the government's power to police adequately. Only in the Arab world do we see some resemblance to biblical justice. Many nations in the Middle East have banned abortion, and if a woman procures one, both she and the doctor are executed. But this isn't the Middle East bro. The most we'd ever see if this unrealistic notion of banning abortion ever really happened would be women and/or doctors fined. It would just be another way for the government to make money off a social problem. That would ensure that the government would undermine efforts to reduce the abortion rate, the fines would become a steady stream of income. Like other fines and penalties for the countless other things our government has criminalized to fleece the people.