Jason DEBATE MATTHEW 24 Luke21 Mark 13

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Jason

brother did you miss this post?

or this one?

or this one?

or this one?

or this one?


Brother, you told me FP will stand up to any criticism, I am levying heavy criticism, and challenging the major pillars of FP, and you don't want to debate it?

I know this is not FP's specialty, but try to answer with a YES or NO:
Do you accept a debate that the second coming of Christ is not past but is future?

Fabulous, you will affirm that Matthew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21 is future, and I will affirm that they are past.

Signed Evangelist Dominic Benincasa

[Evang.Benincasa]

I PMed Prax, and you PMed Prax, we will debate Matthew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21 arre they past or future.

See you then Jason.

In Jesus name

Brother Benincasa

www.OnTimeJournal.com

[JN Anderson]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Fabulous, you will affirm that Matthew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21 is future, and I will affirm that they are past.

Signed Evangelist Dominic Benincasa

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

I PMed Prax, and you PMed Prax, we will debate Matthew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21 arre they past or future.

See you then Jason.

In Jesus name

Brother Benincasa

www.OnTimeJournal.com

TKB, is that you?

I mean, ignoring questions and speaking past the very one you are replying to is very convincing. Just not convincing that FP is a serious doctrine, but rather a doctrine of...nevermind.