Quote:
Originally Posted by Pressing-On
Thank you, much more concrete - she ruled on it.
She made her choice and stood with - it is NOT fundamental to state's rights. And - YES - a 50/50 split! Why couldn't she have ruled that it WAS incorporated.
I would say it was "fundamental" and should be "incorporated" because of the wording:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
|
Think of it this way, since it is necessary for a state to remain free to have a militia, [who] will not infringe upon the right of the state? The obvious answer to me is the federal government. It is the security of the State we are talking about.
Threaded Mode
