I refuse to get into a 3 page debate with you and you're made up sources and all of the rest of your delusions, but I'll say the same thing I've said when this is brought up.
Sure most of us believed that Saddam had WMD's. The Congress, former Presidents and other countries like Britain. The intelligence on Iraq was bad and got worse after GWB took office due to Cheney's strong arming the CIA agents into fabricating intelligence in his favor.
The clear line of difference is that the Neo-Cons that led GWB around by the arm for 8 years, decided the intelligence was sure enough to put American forces on the ground for a full scale invasion/regime change in Iraq. They made the mis-step of believing that was the best way to disarm Iraq when in fact it wasn't. History now proves that the U.N. sanctions and inspections had indeed worked. President Clinton didn't make that error. President Bush senior didn't. Many in Congress urged caution when considering a full invasion as the proper way of disarming Saddam.
Everyone wanted him disarmed from the U.N. to the U.S. to Britain. The grave error was on the part of the Bush administration alone who took the classified intelligence and made the decision that they were certain enough to go to war. Only four members of Congress see that level of intelligence, so most Congressmen were at the mercy of the manipulated intelligence the White House was feeding them and the rest of the world. That error lies sqaurely on the Bushies and no one else.
You try to rewrite history as if everyone you quoted thought the proper way to deal with Saddam Hussein was by launching a ground war. Just because they believed he had wmd's does not mean they believed the proper thing to do was put over 100,000 soldiers on the ground to verify it. Wrong, wrong, wrong coadie.
I haven't written or re written history
I am sharing ideas from your friends and you FORGOT history
We call that selective long term memory ablation. If you need counseling we can drill down and pull up some repressed memories for ya. Couple hundred bucks an hour.
Looks like your pals gave President Bush some bad information and advice?
Looks like your blaming Pres Bush needed to be exposed.
He is a fine leader and it is clear the Dems backed him with money.
Looks like your pals gave President Bush some bad information and advice?
He is a fine leader and it is clear the Dems backed him with money.
Those two statements are fine example of your delusional reasoning. Just to explain so you can hopefully gain a better understanding of the relationship between the President and Congress, Congress doesn't give the President info on CIA gathered intelligence. It's the exact opposite. The President receives a PDB from the CIA every morning and has the highest access to classified levels of intelligence. The President can't be "mislead" by Congress on matters of national security. Delusional...
The concept that a President who was supported by, at times, under 30% of the American people was a "fine" leader is another clear delusion of yours. Another blatant attempt at your re-writing of history you seem to insist on. The Dem's backing him with money, well that speaks for itself also. That sounds like another one of your grand creations straight from coadie land.
I certainly hope all of your mentions of psychology and treating others is another delusion of yours. That would be a scary position for you to be in, IMO. With that said, I'll go ahead and wish you a great day and let you post whatever other kind of delusional concepts you've come up with on the subject.
__________________
In essentials, unity. In non-essentials, liberty. In all things, charity. Augustine
Those two statements are fine example of your delusional reasoning. Just to explain so you can hopefully gain a better understanding of the relationship between the President and Congress, Congress doesn't give the President info on CIA gathered intelligence. It's the exact opposite. The President receives a PDB from the CIA every morning and has the highest access to classified levels of intelligence. The President can't be "mislead" by Congress on matters of national security. Delusional...
The concept that a President who was supported by, at times, under 30% of the American people was a "fine" leader is another clear delusion of yours. Another blatant attempt at your re-writing of history you seem to insist on. The Dem's backing him with money, well that speaks for itself also. That sounds like another one of your grand creations straight from coadie land.
I certainly hope all of your mentions of psychology and treating others is another delusion of yours. That would be a scary position for you to be in, IMO. With that said, I'll go ahead and wish you a great day and let you post whatever other kind of delusional concepts you've come up with on the subject.
Use the word scary to add a little drama.
Delusion big word alert. What is a delusion?
Quote:
Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeleine Albright, Feb. 18, 1998.
Sounds like Albright is deluded and not bright. She said it.
30%
Why so high? Us narrow road people feel like a manority.
52% voted for abortion and a covering for fornication. 100% of the Dems Half the Republicans seem to have no concept of sin. 10% are atheists and/or gay. Must be a bunch of that 30% that like him for his looks.
Moral relativism. If you double your hate of Bush, it wiill not justify voting for abortion.
Do you want me to look up how Dems vote for defense spending? Vote with our money?
The concept that a President who was supported by, at times, under 30% of the American people was a "fine" leader is another clear delusion of yours. Another blatant attempt at your re-writing of history you seem to insist on. The Dem's backing him with money, well that speaks for itself also. That sounds like another one of your grand creations straight from coadie land.
I.
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows that 29% of the nation’s voters now Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Thirty-nine percent (39%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -10. The President’s Approval Index rating is down four points over the past week and 11 points over the past month.
King Hussein seems to be racing down.
Bible says to obey the laws. Now we have a lawless leader.
Mike why is he so surrounded by corruption?
Are you deluded? Jus today he cheated out on the used car program.
Hybrid Mode
