Quote:
Originally Posted by jfrog
The first thing I bolded, I think that is the hardest of your sayings, in fact I don't think I agree and I don't think anyone else will agree it. The human and the divine were inseparable but were still distinct, I don't think the divine partook in the humanity or the humanity in the divinity.
|
I believe the man Jesus Christ partook in the divine nature and that God partook in the human nature. The Word was made flesh. God was manifest, in the flesh. I believe it goes deeper than just an indwelling... I believe it's a co-mingling (if you will) of two distinct and inseparable natures. In Acts we read...
Acts 20:28
28 Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood. (KJV)
This insinuates that Christ's blood was indeed the "blood of God". This means, in my opinion, that God dawned the entire human nature of Jesus Christ... Just as Christ shared and partook in the divine nature.
But that's just my opinion, you're still my bro and I luv ya.
Quote:
|
The other thing I bolded, the bible makes it very clear that it is God and Jesus Christ. I can quote in almost every epistle a greeting that reads to that effect. I don't think oneness people claim to beleive that God is Jesus Christ, they claim that Jesus Christ is God (there is a difference). And I don't think oneness or trinitarians deny that God was in Christ. Though I'm sure they both understand it differently than you are advocating.
|
Good point. I can see where you're coming from.