Read Segraves on "letting down hair"

[D. Wright]

Originally Posted by BobDylan

Your attempts to disqualify my arguments are logical fallacies, when they are not, are red herrings. You say "obfuscation", and "red herring", or "spin" speak of your intent to debate rather that engage in dialogue.Every logical fallacy you have accused me if you are complicit in as well. I could argue tu quoquet, we could go round and round and not get anywhere. This is not a formal debate, there are no scores. I'm not interested in debating this for the purpose of debate. I've made points that are worthy of consideration, and you have obfuscated by accusation of logical fallacy. Evidently you aren't capable of handling the reasoning I present, therefore this dialogue is meaningless...

What a bunch of bunk!

I think you mean tu quoque.

[BobDylan]

Originally Posted by D. Wright

What a bunch of bunk!

Now that right there is one of the most profound and intelligent contributions in this whole thread! ROFL...

Originally Posted by D. Wright

I think you mean tu quoque.

That's exactly what I meant, and I think you and everyone else knows it. For you to enter this discussion at this point with nothing more to add that a spelling correction (when there were numerous words misspelled primarily because I am typing on my iPhone), indicates ignorance, obsessive-compulsive tendencies, a desperate need for a sense of self-affirmation, and uhhh did I say ignorance? If you would have presented something meaningful, I may have given you a little more flexibility, but too late for that now! Keep trying though, someone will take note of and acknowledge your efforts!

[D. Wright]

Originally Posted by BobDylan

Now that right there is one of the most profound and intelligent contributions in this whole thread! ROFL...



That's exactly what I meant, and I think you and everyone else knows it. For you to enter this discussion at this point with nothing more to add that a spelling correction (when there were numerous words misspelled primarily because I am typing on my iPhone), indicates ignorance, obsessive-compulsive tendencies, a desperate need for a sense of self-affirmation, and uhhh did I say ignorance? If you would have presented something meaningful, I may have given you a little more flexibility, but too late for that now! Keep trying though, someone will take note of and acknowledge your efforts!

I added first "what a bunch of bunk".

Because I haven't posted does not mean I didn't read the thread.

Now, do you feel better spitting out all those Christian things to me?

[Michael Phelps]

Originally Posted by D. Wright

I added first "what a bunch of bunk".

Because I haven't posted does not mean I didn't read the thread.

Now, do you feel better spitting out all those Christian things to me?

But at least his wife doesn't cut her hair!

[D. Wright]

Originally Posted by Michael Phelps

But at least his wife doesn't cut her hair!

Good thing.

With an attitude like that he needs to believe her hair has angels in it to save him.

[RandyWayne]

Originally Posted by D. Wright

Good thing.

With an attitude like that he needs to believe her hair has angels in it to save him.

I truly believe there is some truth to that. For someone to say that LS, RR, and their followers really do not mean what they say -over and over and over again, is very likely indicative of the fact that they have bought into it themselves hook, line, and sinker.

[BobDylan]

Originally Posted by D. Wright

I added first "what a bunch of bunk".

Because I haven't posted does not mean I didn't read the thread.

Now, do you feel better spitting out all those Christian things to me?

I thought they were clever! Was only trying to have a little fun!

[pelathais]

Originally Posted by BobDylan

Now that right there is one of the most profound and intelligent contributions in this whole thread! ROFL...



That's exactly what I meant, and I think you and everyone else knows it. For you to enter this discussion at this point with nothing more to add that a spelling correction (when there were numerous words misspelled primarily because I am typing on my iPhone), indicates ignorance, obsessive-compulsive tendencies, a desperate need for a sense of self-affirmation, and uhhh did I say ignorance? If you would have presented something meaningful, I may have given you a little more flexibility, but too late for that now! Keep trying though, someone will take note of and acknowledge your efforts!

C'mon BobDylan, drop the name calling - at least most of it. "OCD and a desperate need for self affirmation" is okay but "ignorance?" Lighten up, Bro.

And did you really have to drop the fact that you own a trendy iPhone? Who are you trying to impress?

BobDylan: "I misspelled because I was wearing my Oakleys in my 'Beemer while texting on my iPhone with one hand and holding a Caffè latte in my other and steering by the knees of my North Face Windpants..."

[DAII]

I hear the latest fad among Pentecost's metrosexuals is to keep their phones in Dolce Gabana fanny packs/man purses.

Originally Posted by pelathais

C'mon BobDylan, drop the name calling - at least most of it. "OCD and a desperate need for self affirmation" is okay but "ignorance?" Lighten up, Bro.

And did you really have to drop the fact that you own a trendy iPhone? Who are you trying to impress?

BobDylan: "I misspelled because I was wearing my Oakleys in my 'Beemer while texting on my iPhone with one hand and holding a Caffè latte in my other and steering by the knees of my North Face Windpants..."

[BobDylan]

Originally Posted by pelathais

C'mon BobDylan, drop the name calling - at least most of it. "OCD and a desperate need for self affirmation" is okay but "ignorance?" Lighten up, Bro.

And did you really have to drop the fact that you own a trendy iPhone? Who are you trying to impress?

BobDylan: "I misspelled because I was wearing my Oakleys in my 'Beemer while texting on my iPhone with one hand and holding a Caffè latte in my other and steering by the knees of my North Face Windpants..."

Good one Pel.... Got a good chuckle out of that last bit! FTR, I didn't intend "ignorant" in a pejorative sense, but rather in the sense of not aware or having information, uninfirmed. My apologies to D Wright...