Obama's Anti- Fed Funded Abortion Executive Order

SOUNWORTHY · #1 03-23-2010, 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

It was an EO that sent my buddies and I to Iraq.

Sure the EO can be overturned, but why would that happen?

Why would President Obama put this out and then take it back? He wouldn't.

Say he's a one-term President, what Republican is liberal enough to reverse this EO?

Again, Conservatives simply do not realize the moral victory won here.
They certainly will not ascribe any kind of morality to a Democrat President-- a President who has stuck his neck out, put his own name on the line, to ensure that abortions are not funded with Federal monies.

President Obama has a Conservative streak, but many are too blinded to see it.

Time to wake up and smell the roses. The only Moral victory Obama could give us would be to take his cronies and leave Washington. He only did that to buy more votes.

Light · #2 03-23-2010, 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SOUNWORTHY

Time to wake up and smell the roses. The only Moral victory Obama could give us would be to take his cronies and leave Washington. He only did that to buy more votes.

It would be nice if all Republicans and their cronies left Washington.

Pressing-On · #3 03-23-2010, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Light

It would be nice if all Republicans and their cronies left Washington.

"In victory magnanimity, in defeat defiance." - Winston Churchill

How do we register our defiance given to us by the Constitution? - the ballot box in November.

Jermyn Davidson · #4 03-23-2010, 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SOUNWORTHY

Time to wake up and smell the roses. The only Moral victory Obama could give us would be to take his cronies and leave Washington. He only did that to buy more votes.

Ok, but he did do it!

That Democrat that is supposedly so, so far to the left, put his name on the line to save the lives of potentially millions of unborn children.

President Obama is not a baby killer.

He did something definitive to demonstrate this.

Pressing-On · #5 03-23-2010, 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

Ok, but he did do it!

That Democrat that is supposedly so, so far to the left, put his name on the line to save the lives of potentially millions of unborn children.

President Obama is not a baby killer.

He did something definitive to demonstrate this.

Quote:

Obama repeals abortion aid rule
January 24, 2009

Stepping quickly into an abortion debate he largely avoided as a candidate, President Obama on Friday overturned a controversial ban on U.S. support to international aid groups that provide abortion services around the world.

President Reagan instituted the rule, also known as the "Mexico City policy," in 1984, stating that the U.S. government would not contribute to groups that "perform or actively promote abortion as a method of family planning in other nations."

http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jan.../na-abortion24

Notice the date that Obama repealed this policy. That's right! The beginning of his presidency!

But we get it - a welfare state cannot support that many people. In order to keep population control down to save us money - we need to abort them. Find out who is having the most kids and set up abortion clinics in those areas.

Jermyn Davidson · #6 03-23-2010, 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Notice the date that Obama repealed this policy. That's right! The beginning of his presidency!

But we get it - a welfare state cannot support that many people. In order to keep population control down to save us money - we need to abort them. Find out who is having the most kids and set up abortion clinics in those areas.

Nothing changes what he just did to save the lives of potentially millions of children.

Pressing-On · #7 03-23-2010, 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

Nothing changes what he just did to save the lives of potentially millions of children.

So, you are cool with his repeal of the Mexico City policy? BTW, it was established by Reagan and when Clinton took office he also repealed it. GWB put it back in place and now Obama repeals it. See how it works?

Jermyn Davidson · #8 03-23-2010, 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

So, you are cool with his repeal of the Mexico City policy? BTW, it was established by Reagan and when Clinton took office he also repealed it. GWB put it back in place and now Obama repeals it. See how it works?

No I am not "cool" with his repeal of the Mexico City policy.

However, I am very cool with his EO.

Honestly, an EO carries A LOT of weight and the same folks attacking it's effectiveness now would be honoring this EO as a sign of moral strength had a Republican signed it.

Pressing-On · #9 03-23-2010, 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

No I am not "cool" with his repeal of the Mexico City policy.

However, I am very cool with his EO.

Honestly, an EO carries A LOT of weight and the same folks attacking it's effectiveness now would be honoring this EO as a sign of moral strength had a Republican signed it.

A Republican wouldn't have signed in this type of Healthcare bill. Love you man, but you don't appear to study too far outside of your perimeters.

This is a huge "Partisan" healthcare vote that affects this whole country. It's like stealing!

We had bi-partisan votes on the Medicare and Social Security votes, BUT not this one! Sneaky, dirty, rotten scoundrels! And I'm only being really polite.

oletime · #10 03-23-2010, 08:43 PM

Just for the record jd he was supposed to sign it, he hasnt, seems he is having second thoughts, no surprise .Total fraud and a liar if he doesnt ! But some of us suspected that from the get go.