Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The D.A.'s Office
Facebook

Notices

The D.A.'s Office The views expressed in this forum are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of AFF or the Admin of AFF.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-31-2010, 02:38 PM
Jeffrey Jeffrey is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,178
Re: The Legalist on Covenant

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLegalist View Post
1) imputation is generally a misued word. "considered/calculate/reckon"

his faith was judged "righteous" This scripture is about judgment of action or response. Has nothing directly to do with "salvation" Abraham had faith before Gen 15:6 in Gen 12. Thus this wasn't some great appointed time in which abraham FINALLY had faith. It's simply a narrative comment from the writer talking about in view what would happen and that God judged his response/faith, righteous/just.... "thus the scripture was fullfilled in Isaacs offering" with respect to Gen 15:6 according to James. This scripture is about God judging a response just. In which he already had faith before hand in Gen 12. what is the significance then and now. The writer is simply saying what he knew that Abraham believed God. "believed God" is with Abraham's life in view not just that moment. God judges the faith "just" or "not" which is James point.

why can I believe Baptism within the context of Romans.... hmmm well because Pauls talk about the reality that happens IN BAPTISM in Romans 6. It isthe appointed time. It according to Paul in colossians is the time of the reality of CHrist SPIRITUALLY cutting away of the flesh/old man from us (the body of judgment and sin) how FAITH IN THE OPERATION/WORKING OF GOD.

God says I am going to circumcise your sins in baptism... you say great and do it by faith that he will do what he said e would do and that is SAVE YOU FROM YOUR SINS!
First of all, I don't see "imputation" in this text. That's a loose word interpreters have used for "reckoned."

Second, no, he wasn't given salvation because he did something. That's what Paul is setting up in vv. 4-5. God is not indebted to us.

v6. David talks about the blessed man who is credited as righteous apart works.

He quotes the Psalm "Blessed is the man whose sin the Lord will never count against him."

This blessedness is for everyone. Paul proves this by tearing down the false idea that righteousness comes by circumcision. He is explicit: it comes by faith.

The focus of Rom 4 (or any of Paul's emphasis for that matter) is not Abraham's doing, it's Abraham's believing (vv. 18-25)

Your statement: This scripture is about God judging a response just is unfortunately inconsistent with the theme of the entire chapter (and letter for that matter)

Regarding baptism: again, don't you preach that baptism is a type of circumcision? If so, how do you continue to believe baptismal regeneration? And don't throw a straw man at me, we all believe in baptism.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
You Might Be a Legalist when.... Cookin-with-Stoneking Fellowship Hall 138 11-20-2008 01:30 PM
Covenant? Vegas Deep Waters 21 05-04-2007 08:32 PM
A Personal Covenant ReformedDave Fellowship Hall 2 03-04-2007 05:12 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Costeon

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.