Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume
The proper question to ask is whether or not your concept is correct concerning "what" or "whom" the two witnesses are. To what does scripture allow for us to understand that the two witnesses might refer? On what basis do you think this just could not have been fulfilled back in the first century?
|
I believe the 2 witnesses are still future, so why would I have to explain them with scripture? I don't believe they were in the 1st century because we have no evidence or historical record of 2 men preaching for 42 months and no resurrection with a global witness. Chapter 11 says the world witnessed their preaching, death and resurrection. What evidence do you have to the contrary? The onus is on preterists not futurists.
Threaded Mode
