Isaiah 3 and jewelry...

[rdp]

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

Appeal to whomever you want Scholars preferrably...

Only deemed acceptable by the Jeffrey board...right?

So a Doctorate degree is how you determine scholarship?

Are you denigrating the time/work that goes into a doctorate degree? Funny thing is that I knew this would be your response...you're soooo predictable!

You must've missed that thread we had here on AFF recently. It'd be good for your blood pressure to go check out.

What's Nate Wilson's degree in? What's DKB's degree in? What schools have them graduated from? How much work have they done in published and recognized exegesis? How many years of handling and reading Koine Greek do they have among them? I think it's humorous you'd include them as a scholarly appeal that's all....

Segraves gave me a breakdown of it several years ago, which included speed reading Greek & being able to translate it from the greek text. You're a hoot Jeffrey...not to mention predictable! Geee, how did I know you'd deride their scholastics. Hmmm, wonder how your credentials would stack up next to theirs...if you even have any!

[Jeffrey]

Originally Posted by rdp

Segraves gave me a breakdown of it several years ago, which included speed reading Greek & being able to translate it from the greek text. You're a hoot Jeffrey...not to mention predictable! Geee, how did I know you'd deride their scholastics. Hmmm, wonder how your credentials would stack up next to theirs...if you even have any!

Didn't you already put your foot in your mouth once with this rambling comment with Baron?

I examine the evidence of other scholars. These scriptures aren't as controversial as we are making it here on AFF. Only Puritans like yourself that choose to ignore the breadth and meaning of a text.

[rdp]

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

Didn't you already put your foot in your mouth once with this rambling comment with Baron?

I examine the evidence of other scholars. These scriptures aren't as controversial as we are making it here on AFF. Only Puritans like yourself that choose to ignore the breadth and meaning of a text.

I simply will not continue to cite the "meaning" of the text, only for you to plod along like it's not there! Believe what you will, I'm sticking w/ the Bible!

Oh yea', if I'm "pure," what's that make you:_______? Talk about "putting your foot in your mouth"...isn't this fun?

[Jeffrey]

Originally Posted by rdp

I simply will not continue to cite the "meaning" of the text, only for you to plod along like it's not there! Believe what you will, I'm sticking w/ the Bible!

Oh yea', if I'm "pure," what's that make you:_______? Talk about "putting your foot in your mouth"...isn't this fun?

I didn't call you "pure."

Your mangling my words like you do Paul's. Careful now

[rdp]

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

I didn't call you "pure."

Your mangling my words like you do Paul's. Careful now

Ughhh, from where would you suppose the word "pure" derives etymologically:_______? Need some help? "p-u-r-e"! Wrong about that just as you are "not with gold...".

Try again................

[Jeffrey]

Originally Posted by rdp

Ughhh, from where would you suppose the word "pure" derives etymologically:_______? Need some help? "p-u-r-e"! Wrong about that just as you are "not with gold...".

Try again................

HAHAHA. Thanks for doing what you're doing right now. Really showcasing, quite nakedly the broken logic you have brought to the table here.

Exhibit Z of what you do to the human language.

Because the word "Puritan" has etymology with the word "pure," therefore when I called you a "Puritan" I was really calling you "pure." hahahahahahaahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaa

[rdp]

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

HAHAHA. Thanks for doing what you're doing right now. Really showcasing, quite nakedly the broken logic you have brought to the table here.

Exhibit Z of what you do to the human language.

Because the word "Puritan" has etymology with the word "pure," therefore when I called you a "Puritan" I was really calling you "pure." hahahahahahaahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaa

Strawman alert! My point is that you cannot separate the term from its root meaning...another blunder from the Jeffrey bench!