Isaiah 3 and jewelry...

[rdp]

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

You can't?

Are you telling me a person that is a Puritan is also pure?


Maybe take a break and come back in 10?

Ughhh, I was referencing the etymology of the TERM...not the person! You might wanna' "take 10!"

[Jeffrey]

Originally Posted by rdp

Ughhh, I was referencing the etymology of the TERM...not the person! You might wanna' "take 10!"

You said I called you "pure" because the word "puritan" has an etymology in the word "pure." Come on, rdp, you're really going to keep arguing this?

I called you a Puritan. The etymology is not relevant. It's quite obvious from the CONTEXT that I am referring to those 16th-17th Century Protestants and the later ascetic movements that associated with their beliefs. Actually, it wasn't that deep either. It was more of a pejorative. But whatever.

Fact is... we are actually arguing that? Really? Proof that you'd argue with the moon is purple.

[rdp]

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

You said I called you "pure" because the word "puritan" has an etymology in the word "pure." Come on, rdp, you're really going to keep arguing this?

I called you a Puritan. The etymology is not relevant. It's quite obvious from the CONTEXT that I am referring to those 16th-17th Century Protestants and the later ascetic movements that associated with their beliefs. Actually, it wasn't that deep either. It was more of a pejorative. But whatever.

Fact is... we are actually arguing that? Really? Proof that you'd argue with the moon is purple.

And it's perfectly fine for you to post 3 paragraphs about it, then tell ME that I'D argue about the Moon......you just never will get it will ya'.....I referenced the term...or do you not know what etymology is? It's a term, not a person!

[Jeffrey]

Originally Posted by rdp

And it's perfectly fine for you to post 3 paragraphs about it, then tell ME that I'D argue about the Moon......you just never will get it will ya'.....I referenced the term...or do you not know what etymology is? It's a term, not a person!

ROFLOL

I'm not exaggerating. I'm really rolling laughing right now.

I'm incredulous that you'd argue something as stupid as what you are.... etymology doesn't have ........ to do with what we were talking about. Term? Person? How about, me calling you a Puritan in no way has any meaning that i called you Pure. How can you argue otherwise? lol

[rdp]

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

ROFLOL

I'm not exaggerating. I'm really rolling laughing right now.

I'm incredulous that you'd argue something as stupid as what you are.... etymology doesn't have ........ to do with what we were talking about. Term? Person? How about, me calling you a Puritan in no way has any meaning that i called you Pure. How can you argue otherwise? lol

Ughhh, I know that you didn't LITERALLY call me pure....remember that bit about "context" of statements?????? The puritans took their name from the term "pure" because they saw themselves as "pure," while everyone else was not...according to them.

"LOL" indeeeeeeeeeeeeeed!

Now, watch him get the last word in everyone, then tell ME that I'd argue about the moon !!!

[Jeffrey]

Originally Posted by rdp

Ughhh, I know that you didn't LITERALLY call me pure....remember that bit about "context" of statements?????? The puritans took their name from the term "pure" because they saw themselves as "pure," while everyone else was not...according to them.

"LOL" indeeeeeeeeeeeeeed!

Now, watch him get the last word in everyone, then tell ME that I'd argue about the moon !!!

Are you suggesting I couldn't connect the dots of the word "pure" and "puritans?" How did that ever relate to my statement to you! Oh wait, because you went off on some ridiculous tangent about "it's better to be pure" and even referenced word etymology. That was a long route to be cute.