Quote:
Originally Posted by coadie
Amen. These are sketches and not actual pictures of progression. Art work doesn't prove evolution. The moment the "cupped" eye closes, we have blindness. The next step is the Assumption that the epithelium cells are clear. If they are not, blindness. Kinds fall for this and no one can find it.
Pelthais' god isn't big enough to create complete species. These small god followers do not believe the small god can create and get writings to match the creation.
It is very easy to write simulation software to create animation to show evolution. This is lazy work. No microscopes but just a keyboard and making graphics.
|
Here is some more interesting info (with links :-)
.....However, it was once used to prove the age of the earth and all other things in it. But only in the past few decades has it been shown to be totally unreliable in determining the earth to be 14 plus billion years old.
Here is a link to a very long and technical article, but it is well worth the reading and concentration. It gives unmistakable proof that the earth falls within the biblical account record. (end of excerpt)
http://www.examiner.com/biblical-in-...nfirm-creation
.....The Epicureans were the evolutionists of the day! They typically held to a belief derived from Epicurus that there were no gods that intervened in the world. They believed that these gods, like men, were made of matter and that over long ages atoms, the basic component of all matter, gave rise to life and that life gave rise to higher life such as mankind. (end of excerpt)
(the apostle Paul would argue against evolutionists)
http://www.answersingenesis.org/arti...-evolutionists
.....All the discoveries from excavations and studies over the last hundred years or so show that, contrary to evolutionists' expectations, living things came into existence suddenly, in perfect and flawless form, in other words that they were "created." (end of excerpt)
http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/20questions02.html
Also read "five questions evolutionists would rather dodge":
http://www.designinference.com/docum...estions_Ev.pdf