Gay Pastor's(xupc)recent Letter to the UPCI ! ! !

[Coonskinner]

Originally Posted by brad2723

May I ask what rule I violated? Also, if there are two points to be discussed, and the Administration of this website can obviouslly only support one of the two views, wouldn't the opposing viewpoint automatically be promoting something contrary to what the Administration supports? How can silencing the promotion of an opposing viewpoint provide for a healthy and productive discussion? Are you going to censor/edit a comment made by a Trinitarian because their comments are promoting a Trinity?

The truth is pretty evident. The Administration, as well as others who were participating in this discussion, were uneasy with the fact that someone had legitimate arguments that were well informed and effectively communicated. I was censored for no other reason than I was ruffling the narcissistic feathers of those who had the ability to silence me.

Insufferable arrogance.

I find it extremely ironic that you accuse others of narcissism after your preening self-evaluation of how well informed and effective a communicator.

Let me clue you in on a little theological insight from Romans 1.

One of the steps down the road to perversion is worshipping the creature more than the Creator.

The reason many homosexuals go that direction is that they are so in love with themselves that they become attracted to a mirror image of what they are, rather than the opposite gender.

You are a textbook case.

Originally Posted by Coonskinner

Insufferable arrogance.

I find it extremely ironic that you accuse others of narcissism after your preening self-evaluation of how well informed and effective a communicator.

Let me clue you in on a little theological insight from Romans 1.

One of the steps down the road to perversion is worshipping the creature more than the Creator.

The reason many homosexuals go that direction is that they are so in love with themselves that they become attracted to a mirror image of what they are, rather than the opposite gender.

You are a textbook case.

Acknowledging that my thoughts were effectively communicated is far from excessive self-admiration (as seen in narcissistic behavior). What does resemble narcissistic behavior is the belief by some participants, including the administration, that their views are somehow more valid than mine, that they are willing to take advantage of their ability to censor my viewpoint in an attempt to achieve their own end, their apparant lack of empathy for anyone with a differing opinion or life experience, as well as their belief that they are "special" and have some divine right to inflict judgment and damnation on another human being.

Textbook case?

PS - I am not a fan of my own reflection. Honest.