|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |

09-29-2007, 01:43 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,617
|
|
|
For all elders and those in the 'know'...
I realize we can't shut the barn door NOW, but I have some 'Point of Order' questions...
1. Who is eligible to vote on the national scale?! a. Is it all card carrying ministers, or is it pastors only?! b. If it is just pastors and ass't pastors, suppose a church has more ass't or associate pastors than you can shake a stick at...who decides which one gets to vote?! 2. Are credentials checked to see if the one voting IS eligible?!
3. Do you think a two-thirds margin is better than majority in national voting?!
Anyone...?!
|

09-29-2007, 01:46 PM
|
 |
Guest
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In a cold dark cave.....
Posts: 4,624
|
|
|
It requires seating in a Sectional Conference as a duly approved delagate for a church to vote in District and National elections.
There is no proxy voting allowed either.
__________________
I am not a member here -Do not PM me please?
|

09-29-2007, 01:50 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,102
|
|
|
Good questions.
1. Pastors, one assistant pastor per church, full-time evangelists and Christian educators, missionaries, and HQ executives. Also anyone deriving full-time income from ministry can vote if they present a letter to the roster committee.
2. No, credentials are not checked at GC. Anyone without a beard and in a suit can vote, and no one would say a thing.
3. No, simple majority should rule.
|

09-29-2007, 01:50 PM
|
 |
Beautiful are the feet......
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Right...behind...you!
Posts: 6,600
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barb
I realize we can't shut the barn door NOW, but I have some 'Point of Order' questions...
1. Who is eligible to vote on the national scale?! a. Is it all card carrying ministers, or is it pastors only?! b. If it is just pastors and ass't pastors, suppose a church has more ass't or associate pastors than you can shake a stick at...who decides which one gets to vote?! 2. Are credentials checked to see if the one voting IS eligible?!
3. Do you think a two-thirds margin is better than majority in national voting?!
Anyone...?!
|
If a 2/3 majority had been needed to pass a resolution, most of the resolutions concerning "standards" would have never passed!
|

09-29-2007, 01:56 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,617
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastor Poster
Good questions.
1. Pastors, one assistant pastor per church, full-time evangelists and Christian educators, missionaries, and HQ executives. Also anyone deriving full-time income from ministry can vote if they present a letter to the roster committee.
2. No, credentials are not checked at GC. Anyone without a beard and in a suit can vote, and no one would say a thing.
3. No, simple majority should rule.
|
But couldn't the unethical among us play the system by bringing in more than one ass't or whatever?!
I love that part, Pastor P, " Anyone without a beard and in a suit can vote, and no one would say a thing."
And in a majority vote, if it is 50-50, it just takes one vote to tip the scale...hardly seems right to me.
Just a layperson's view...
|

09-29-2007, 01:56 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,617
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pianoman
If a 2/3 majority had been needed to pass a resolution, most of the resolutions concerning "standards" would have never passed!
|
Oops...:sshhh
|

09-29-2007, 02:03 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,102
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barb
But couldn't the unethical among us play the system by bringing in more than one ass't or whatever?!
I love that part, Pastor P, "Anyone without a beard and in a suit can vote, and no one would say a thing."
And in a majority vote, if it is 50-50, it just takes one vote to tip the scale...hardly seems right to me.
Just a layperson's view...
|
Sure they could.
I think, at a minimum, we should require credentials be shown at the door before anyone can enter a business session. I also think registered voters should sit in delegations by District just like at a political convention.
This would help sort out confusion.
|

09-29-2007, 02:21 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,617
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastor Poster
Sure they could.
I think, at a minimum, we should require credentials be shown at the door before anyone can enter a business session. I also think registered voters should sit in delegations by District just like at a political convention.
This would help sort out confusion.
|
I agree...so, now this is really deep, Elder...
If this uneducated WOMAN can figure this out, respectfully, why haven't the powers that be?!
|

09-29-2007, 02:26 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,102
|
|
|
I'm not touching that one. lol
|

09-29-2007, 02:26 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 231
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barb
I agree...so, now this is really deep, Elder...
If this uneducated WOMAN can figure this out, respectfully, why haven't the powers that be?!
|
I've got a feeling there are enough "powers that be" who lurk on here....don't be surprised if things change next year.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:48 AM.
| |