Mark of the beast idea

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by Sean

Really Mike?......look what you said.....what am I supposed to think you said here?

That makes absolutely no sense at all. You clearly do not know what a foreshadow is.

Moses flatly stated Good would raise up a property like him. That is nothing to you? This betrays a gaping hole in your theology. Wow.

You see no topology in Moses as a little child going into Egypt escaping death by massacre as Jesus did the same? Wow.

There's nothing vague about it. QUOTE MFBLUME


I do read your stuff Mike, thats the problem.


I need to be like sgt. Schultz when I see your posts and just say..."I see nothing, I hear nothing, I know nothing"...LOL

Theyre my words but they in no way say JESUS was a type of Moses. Read it more carefully. Jesus is not a type of Moses... Lol. He's the anti-type and Moses was a type of Him! Jesus is anti type, not type. Read it again. You're unbelievable. Now will you stop lying about my beliefs?

[Sean]

Originally Posted by mfblume

Theyre my words but they in no way say JESUS was a type of Moses. Read it more carefully. Jesus is not a type of Moses... Lol. He's the anti-type and Moses was a type of Him! Jesus is anti type, not type. Read it again. You're unbelievable. Now will you stop lying about my beliefs?

Antitype?...where does it say that in the post....it says (topology)WHAT ARE YOU SAYING?...TYPE?

Must I read your mind.

I am trying to figure your beliefs out, but you only feed us a little at a time. I must sometimes just make a decision, based on what I read.
BTW...thanks for clarifying your beliefs there, whatever they are.




That makes absolutely no sense at all. You clearly do not know what a foreshadow is.

Moses flatly stated Good would raise up a property like him. That is nothing to you? This betrays a gaping hole in your theology. Wow.

You see no topology in Moses as a little child going into Egypt escaping death by massacre as Jesus did the same? Wow.

There's nothing vague about it. QUOTE MFBLUME

ANTITYPE???....


.to·pol·o·gy
təˈpäləjē/Submit
noun
1.
MATHEMATICS
the study of geometric properties and spatial relations unaffected by the continuous change of shape or size of figures.
plural noun: topologies
2.
the way in which constituent parts are interrelated or arranged.
"the topology of a computer n

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by Sean

Antitype?...where does it say that in the post....it says (topology)WHAT ARE YOU SAYING?...TYPE?

Must I read your mind.

IT IS TYPOLOGY. A typo with my mobile phone.

TYPOLOGY.

I am trying to figure your beliefs out, but you only feed us a little at a time. I must sometimes just make a decision, based on what I read.
BTW...thanks for clarifying your beliefs there, whatever they are.

I told you over and over again that Moses foreshadowed Jesus. But by the way you responded, you do not know what it means to foreshadow something. That which foreshadows something is a type of that same something. Moses foreshadowing Christ (which is what I claimed all along) means MOSES IS A TYPE OF JESUS.

Did you get it this time? Can you see how you did not know what foreshadow means and got it backwards? lol You say you cannot read my beliefs correctly since I ma not giving enough? No, everyone else got it. You just did not know what FORESHADOW means/

That makes absolutely no sense at all. You clearly do not know what a foreshadow is.

Moses flatly stated Good would raise up a property like him. That is nothing to you? This betrays a gaping hole in your theology. Wow.

You see no topology in Moses as a little child going into Egypt escaping death by massacre as Jesus did the same? Wow.

There's nothing vague about it. QUOTE MFBLUME

ANTITYPE???....


.to·pol·o·gy
təˈpäləjē/Submit
noun
1.
MATHEMATICS
the study of geometric properties and spatial relations unaffected by the continuous change of shape or size of figures.
plural noun: topologies
2.
the way in which constituent parts are interrelated or arranged.
"the topology of a computer n

TYPOLOGY.

Now, do you know what an ANTITYPE is?

I trust not.

So look:

an·ti·type
ˈan(t)iˌtīp/
noun
1. a person or thing that represents the opposite of someone or something else.
2. something that is represented by a symbol.

Jesus is the antitype of Moses, because JESUS IS REPRESENTED BY MOSES. MOSES is NOT represented by Jesus. You distinctly told the direct OPPOSITE of what I have been saying every time you accused me of saying Jesus was a type of Moses. lol So,,... PLEASE get it right this time. Everyone else did. Now that you know what FORESHADOW and ANTITYPE means, ... just.... please. (sigh)

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Rev. Blume, I have a question for those who hold the Partial Preterist position...

Where in Scripture do we see the literal physical return of Jesus depicted?

Acts 1:11, 1 Thessalonians 4. 1 Corinthians 15. Plus some more.

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by Sean

Preterism's newspaper is Josephus and any other tidbit of historical wording they can find on the internet.

Lies. I challenged you to show where i referenced Josephus to you, since you said it's all i ever said. You couldn't find one post. So please stop these lies.

[Sean]

Originally Posted by mfblume

Lies. I challenged you to show where i referenced Josephus to you, since you said it's all i ever said. You couldn't find one post. So please stop these lies.

LIES?

In your sites here, you use Josephus as a reference....https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...77880786,d.aWw

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...VbC3mpEfQZQ5SA


This post you commented on was not about you at all. You just took it personal. I said the "preterists" were using Josephus as a reference. Thats it.

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by Sean

LIES?

In your sites here, you use Josephus as a reference....https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...77880786,d.aWw

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...VbC3mpEfQZQ5SA


This post you commented on was not about you at all. You just took it personal. I said the "preterists" were using Josephus as a reference. Thats it.

Now you lie about what your words were. You said that all I ever said to you was was josephus. That's what I took issue with you about. You talked about our chats on this forum. You addressed me. So, yes, lying. You spoke more about Josephus than any preterist here.

[Sean]

Originally Posted by mfblume

Now you lie about what your words were. You said that all I ever said to you was was josephus. That's what I took issue with you about. You talked about our chats on this forum. You addressed me. So, yes, lying. You spoke more about Josephus than any preterist here. And contrary to your falsehood, I said nothing to you about Josephus.

I addressed all of you preterists and Josephus as a whole group. Sorry if you took it personal. But obviously you do use Josephus as a reference to preterism as we can see on your sites.

You keep saying "LIE" and other such bold words to try to prejudice your followers though.
You are showing me signs of being on the ropes doctrinally.

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by Sean

I addressed all of you preterists and Josephus as a whole group. Sorry if you took it personal. But obviously you do use Josephus as a reference to preterism as we can see on your sites.

You keep saying "LIE" and other such bold words to try to prejudice your followers though.
You are showing me signs of being on the ropes doctrinally.

YOU WERE TALKING TO ME. You said people can GOOGLE MY NAME "MFBLUME" and "JOSEPHUS" and see it. I responded say the only website that came up with mfblume and Josephus was YOUR WORDS ON THIS FORUM! lo. You said it is all I ever said TO YOU. Stop backpeddling and admit you were wrong.

It was never a matter of whether or not I mentioned Josephus ELSEWHERE. It was a matter of me and you on this forum. I engaged you on this forum more than anyone has about preterism when you said all I ever said to YOU was Josephus. That was a lie. All I ever did with YOU was talk BIBLE BIBLE BIBLE. The you'd back out due to some excuse and never answer my questions. So, enough of this nonsense. Get on with the discussion.

[mfblume]

Sean, do you even know what a TYPE is?

By the way, I still recall you saying the last days lasted for the duration of the whole church age since the day of Pentecost until now and beyond. Then you said LAST DAY SAINTS were only today's saints whom the apostles wrote to about LAST DAYS. We don't forget these things.