The dawg-ma of trinity is = to Preterism - Page 3

houston · #1 10-21-2015, 08:14 AM

Ferd, dyslexia...

Cracker Barrel · #2 10-21-2015, 08:44 AM

Da fire didn't fall for Elijah when he preached and prayed the prayer. The fire came down when he was done. I never said (when the preacher gets the people excited, I said when God comes down to validate the message. This is a common excuse for dead church. Come on produce a message where the specific preaching on Preterism is being taugh or preached and God come down. It does not exist. Lolo I say!
1kings18:38Then the fire of the Lord fell, and consumed the burnt sacrifice, and the wood, and the stones, and the dust, and licked up the water that was in the trench. And when all the people saw it, they fell on their faces: and they said, The Lord, he is the God; the Lord, he is the God.

Ferd · #3 10-21-2015, 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cracker Barrel

Da fire didn't fall for Elijah when he preached and prayed the prayer. The fire came down when he was done. I never said (when the preacher gets the people excited, I said when God comes down to validate the message. This is a common excuse for dead church. Come on produce a message where the specific preaching on Preterism is being taugh or preached and God come down. It does not exist. Lolo I say!
1kings18:38Then the fire of the Lord fell, and consumed the burnt sacrifice, and the wood, and the stones, and the dust, and licked up the water that was in the trench. And when all the people saw it, they fell on their faces: and they said, The Lord, he is the God; the Lord, he is the God.

sorry. you are just trying justify your opening statement. it fails. sound doctrine stands on its own .

Those fires fell for Elijah as the judgment of God on followers of false gods. period.

When Jonathan Edwards stood up and read his sermon "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" the communities around were shaken to their foundations. It was in many ways the foundation of The Great Awakening.

Edwards was Calvinist, Trinitarian, Congregationalist. For you to suggest that validation comes in the form of some kind of wind of God is nonsense and will never ever be the validation of Gods approval. Such teaching is bound to send people to a devils hell!

I will not even look around for some nonsense of people shouting over things I either don't believe or don't care enough about to even consider. But I am not about to suggest that what I DO believe is validated because someone can produce a YouTube video of folk shouting at some sermon where someone said something I do agree with.

People got sideways with emotional response during the Brownwood revival. It was a bunch of charismatics talking about god fill their teeth with gold. by your approach, that's validated theology!

That's crazy. That's not Godly and nowhere in the bible will you find what you are suggesting here. not one single time. and you are misusing scripture trying to suggest Elijah's sermon was validated by the fires of God. That aint what happened. God SENT him to deal with the false prophets. There destruction was ordained before Elijah ever showed up on the scene.

Cracker Barrel · #4 10-21-2015, 09:05 AM

Brew,
Where did I say emotional response or any work the flesh, or shout? Get your head on things above Bruda You equate the move of God with shouting no way. But I do know he does validate his message and his man. I said when God comes down. Don't try to change what I mean because you believe this Preterism dawgma. Bug

Ferd · #5 10-21-2015, 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cracker Barrel

Brew,
Where did I say emotional response or any work the flesh, or shout? Get your head on things above Bruda You equate the move of God with shouting no way. But I do know he does validate his message and his man. I said when God comes down. Don't try to change what I mean because you believe this Preterism dawgma. Bug

your words:
"but in our meetings the power is manifest and the people walk away with singing shouting and saying WHAT A GREAT GOD!!!!"

emotionalism. period.

I am for all of those things. I believe in all of those things. But those things are NOT the validation of sound doctrine.

Sound Doctrine IS the validation for sound doctrine.