More on Skirts

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by n david

So it really is all a big show, well, with Pliny at least.

Pants on women are a sin and abomination ... but, not so much that it requires them actually saying so to the women who wear them. And definitely they don't want to talk about the consequences of it being a sin and an abomination.

Remind me again, what happened to the watchman who didn't warn the people?

"But if the watchman see the sword come, and blow not the trumpet, and the people be not warned; if the sword come, and take any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at the watchman's hand."

If you believe pants on women is a sin and abomination, and you do not warn them of the judgment to come ... their blood is on your hands, Pliny.

Pliny doesn't realize how serious things become once they are considered an abomination.

[Pliny]

Originally Posted by n david

So it really is all a big show, well, with Pliny at least.

Pants on women are a sin and abomination ... but, not so much that it requires them actually saying so to the women who wear them. And definitely they don't want to talk about the consequences of it being a sin and an abomination.

Remind me again, what happened to the watchman who didn't warn the people?

"But if the watchman see the sword come, and blow not the trumpet, and the people be not warned; if the sword come, and take any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at the watchman's hand."

If you believe pants on women is a sin and abomination, and you do not warn them of the judgment to come ... their blood is on your hands, Pliny.

Another false allegation. I have said repeatedly that I teach and preach and try to build people up. That is what a watchman does. He warns by telling people about danger. This is a metaphor for teaching and preaching. Thank you for demonstrating once again that you have no idea what you are talking about.

Once again we see the desperation to change the subject.

Please demonstrate, Biblically, where a godly woman wore pants.
Since it is apparent that this cannot be done, the leftists must change the subject and launch ad-hominem attacks in an attempt to hide the fact that they cannot produce the passage requested.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Pliny

Another false allegation. I have said repeatedly that I teach and preach and try to build people up. That is what a watchman does. He warns by telling people about danger. This is a metaphor for teaching and preaching.

Yet you are not warning women who wear pants of the sword and judgment which is coming.

Instead, you are standing idly on a wall, watching the judgment come, and scratching their itching ears, but refusing to say anything about it because you don't want to "kick Christ off the judgment seat."

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by n david

Yet you are not warning women who wear pants of the sword and judgment which is coming.

Instead, you are standing idly on a wall, watching the judgment come, and scratching their itching ears, but refusing to say anything about it because you don't want to "kick Christ off the judgment seat."

[Pliny]

Originally Posted by n david

Yet you are not warning women who wear pants of the sword and judgment which is coming.

Instead, you are standing idly on a wall, watching the judgment come, and scratching their itching ears, but refusing to say anything about it because you don't want to "kick Christ off the judgment seat."

How do you know what I teach? Have you ever been in one of my Bible studies?

Answer NO. Here, we cannot even get past whether or not pants are worn.

Still waiting for you to demonstrate where a godly woman wore pants. You see, you can try to ignore the facts but they are indeed stubborn things.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Pliny

How do you know what I teach? Have you ever been in one of my Bible studies?

No, and I don't need to attend one. I have dozens of pages of your notes here. You claim it's a sin for a woman to wear pants, but then refuse to admit what judgment awaits an unrepentant sinner. You use the excuse that you don't want to "kick Christ off His seat of judgment."

All the OT prophets and the Apostles were able to clearly name the sin and clearly state what the judgment was to come -- why can't you? They didn't "kick Christ off His seat of judgment" by declaring the judgment to come.

Early century preachers like John Edwards stood and condemned sin and clearly stated the judgment to come.

Why must you use this excuse? Is it because you really don't believe women wearing pants will go to hell? Or is it because you're too afraid of being labeled a legalist?

One thing is clear, the prophets, apostles and preachers down throughout history stand as proof of what a Godly minister and watchman says and does. They didn't cower with excuses. They proclaimed with authority the judgment of God.

So why aren't you?

[n david]

Pliny, you posted that you believe women who wear pants are committing sin. If this is what you truly believe, what are you doing to warn them of the judgment which is to come if they do not repent and continue to wear pants?

Tell me, man of God, the watchman on the wall: what are you going to do?

You have argued in dozens of posts of how it's a sin and abomination for a woman to wear pants; yet, you have cringed at the thought that this sin and abomination could lead to death and hell.

Man of God, watchman on the wall, why are you standing idly by, watching but warning not of the judgment to come.

"""And thou, son of man, be not afraid of them, neither be afraid of their words, though briers and thorns be with thee, and thou dost dwell among scorpions: be not afraid of their words, nor be dismayed at their looks, though they be a rebellious house."""

"""But thou, son of man, hear what I say unto thee; Be not thou rebellious like that rebellious house: open thy mouth, and eat that I give thee And when I looked, behold, an hand was sent unto me; and, lo, a roll of a book was therein; And he spread it before me; and it was written within and without: and there was written therein lamentations, and mourning, and woe."""

What if Ezekiel and the other prophets refused to warn the people of impending judgment because they didn't want to "kick Christ off His seat of judgment?"

No wonder the church is such a mess! Too many ministers too frightened and scared to call sin what it is. Too afraid to actually tell people what will happen if they are unrepentant and die in their sins.

It's as though some don't believe in hell or eternal damnation.

[Pliny]

Originally Posted by n david

Pliny, you posted that you believe women who wear pants are committing sin. If this is what you truly believe, what are you doing to warn them of the judgment which is to come if they do not repent and continue to wear pants?

Tell me, man of God, the watchman on the wall: what are you going to do?

You have argued in dozens of posts of how it's a sin and abomination for a woman to wear pants; yet, you have cringed at the thought that this sin and abomination could lead to death and hell.

Man of God, watchman on the wall, why are you standing idly by, watching but warning not of the judgment to come.

"""And thou, son of man, be not afraid of them, neither be afraid of their words, though briers and thorns be with thee, and thou dost dwell among scorpions: be not afraid of their words, nor be dismayed at their looks, though they be a rebellious house."""

"""But thou, son of man, hear what I say unto thee; Be not thou rebellious like that rebellious house: open thy mouth, and eat that I give thee And when I looked, behold, an hand was sent unto me; and, lo, a roll of a book was therein; And he spread it before me; and it was written within and without: and there was written therein lamentations, and mourning, and woe."""

What if Ezekiel and the other prophets refused to warn the people of impending judgment because they didn't want to "kick Christ off His seat of judgment?"

No wonder the church is such a mess! Too many ministers too frightened and scared to call sin what it is. Too afraid to actually tell people what will happen if they are unrepentant and die in their sins.

It's as though some don't believe in hell or eternal damnation.

Another ad-hominem attack. Anything to keep from demonstrating biblically where a godly woman wore pants.

Please provide the passage. Inquiring minds want to know. You can't and we all know it.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Pliny

Another ad-hominem attack.

Hurts when the truth hits home.

Any man of God who refuses to denounce sin and warn of the coming judgment isn't worthy to be called a minister of God.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by n david

Hurts when the truth hits home.

Any man of God who refuses to denounce sin and warn of the coming judgment isn't worthy to be called a minister of God.

Pliny isn't a man of God, he coddles what he believes to be abomination under the guise of self-serving mercy. For if he preached it as he claims to believe it... he'd have to be far more condemnatory towards women in pants.