More on Skirts

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Do you think an average woman can wear Bruce Jenner's high heels?

Pants were worn by priests, military cavalry, and by Hebrew men under their cloaks. Jordache jeans wouldn't of made it in the United States in 1800s. Do you agree?

I'm curious, do you have any Scripture that affirms that Hebrew men wore pants under their cloaks?

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Aquila

I'm curious, do you have any Scripture that affirms that Hebrew men wore pants under their cloaks?

I posted them? Didn't you look at my original posting with the scripture references? I guess I should of posted them again, so you can ignore them again?

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Amanah

However, about the only difference is that women’s pants are usually tighter to draw the attention of men to parts of their body that they should not be thinking about, and they don’t have a zipper. Tight pants on women do not bode well as an argument for women’s pants among those desirous of godly living. The real truth about this “difference between pants” argument is that it is not an argument, but a vindication in hindsight for those who wish to justify a desired behavior.

Oh, I agree to an extent. I've seen pants that were far too tight on women.

But... I'm going to be blunt here. I pray you understand me, because if I candy coat it, I don't think you'll really get the full impact of what I'm saying.

Frankly, a woman in a dress or skirt is a far greater turn on than a woman in pants because it's "easy access". Having been in the Army, a woman with a dress or skirt is far more likely to flat-back than one wearing jeans. If she smokes, your chances are nearly 80%.

That's just been my experience.

[consapente89]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Oh, I agree to an extent. I've seen pants that were far too tight on women.

But... I'm going to be blunt here. I pray you understand me, because if I candy coat it, I don't think you'll really get the full impact of what I'm saying.

Frankly, a woman in a dress or skirt is a far greater turn on than a woman in pants because it's "easy access". Having been in the Army, a woman with a dress or skirt is far more likely to flat-back than one wearing jeans. If she smokes, your chances are nearly 80%.

That's just been my experience.

You are ridiculous

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by consapente89

You are ridiculous

Hey, I'm just telling it as it is. lol

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Hey, I'm just telling it as it is. lol

Is that why Raven posted about you?

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by consapente89

You are ridiculous

I was thinking of another term, but "ridiculous" works.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by consapente89

You are ridiculous

[Amanah]

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/247826.php

health issues . . .

[Aquila]

What is immodest about this woman?

http://modeststyle.kopiblog.com/wp-c...dest-style.jpg