|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|

05-22-2017, 09:56 PM
|
|
Saved by Grace
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Decatur, TX
Posts: 5,247
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa
How dumb. 
|
Using scripture in context is dumb?
But believing that a God who wills none to perish, took upon Himself human flesh, subjected Himself to the greatest humility and blasphemy to bear each and every sin, hung on the cross dying while being mocked "come down off that cross if you are the Son of God", who had every ability and power to come down, yet remained there, fixed and dying, held not by weakness but by love, to demonstrate His love for every one us, and so to make atonement for all of our sins, any who will come to Him in faith and repentance.......
.........
Will send a woman to hell to burn forever for all eternity, because she wore slacks?
Good grief, if thats not dumb, I don't know what is.
What a confused theology you espouse. What a weak and errant view you hold of the atonement.
What a misunderstanding you demonstrate of God's character.
What a lack of knowledge you demonstrate of the power of the living Christ to save those who come to Him to the uttermost.
What a warped view of grace you cling to.
__________________
"Resolved: That all men should live to the glory of God. Resolved, secondly: That whether or not anyone else does, I will." ~Jonathan Edwards
"The only man who has the right to say he is justified by grace alone is the man who has left all to follow Christ." ~Dietrich Bonheoffer, The Cost of Discipleship
"Preachers who should be fishing for men are now too often fishing for compliments from men." ~Leonard Ravenhill
Last edited by Jason B; 05-22-2017 at 10:49 PM.
|

05-22-2017, 09:57 PM
|
 |
Unvaxxed Pureblood too
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 41,046
|
|
|
Re: More on Skirts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason B
Using scripture in context is dumb?
But believing that a God who wills none to perish, took upon Himself human flesh, subjected Himself to the greatest humility and blasphemy to bear each and every sin, hung on the cross dying while being mocked "come down off that cross if you are the Son of God", who had every ability and power to come down, yet remained there, fixed and dying, held not by weakness but by love, to demonstrate His love for every one us, and so to make atonement for all of our sins, any who will come to Him in faith and repentance.......
.........
Will send a woman to hell to burn forever for all eternity, because she wore slacks?
Goid grief, if thats not dumb, I don't know what is.
What a confused theology you espouse. What a weak and errant view you hold of the atonement.
What a misunderstanding you demonstrate of God's character.
What a lack of knowledge you demonstrate of the power of the living Christ to save those who come to Him to the uttermost.
What a warped view of grace you cling to.
|
Please refer to Easias' post.
__________________
"all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed."
~Declaration of Independence
|

05-22-2017, 10:01 PM
|
 |
Unvaxxed Pureblood too
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 41,046
|
|
|
Re: More on Skirts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason B
Will send a woman to hell to burn forever for all eternity, because she wore slacks?
|
No, just send you to hell for being obnoxiously dumb.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason B
Goid grief, if thats not dumb, I don't know what is.
|
Goid? I don't know what it is either.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason B
What a confused theology you espouse. What a weak and errant view you hold of the atonement.
What a misunderstanding you demonstrate of God's character.
What a lack of knowledge you demonstrate of the power of the living Christ to save those who come to Him to the uttermost.
What a warped view of grace you cling to.
|
__________________
"all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed."
~Declaration of Independence
|

05-22-2017, 10:21 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
|
|
|
Re: More on Skirts
Wow. Our conservative brethren don't believe cross dressers are effeminate.
|

05-22-2017, 10:22 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
|
|
|
Re: More on Skirts
Our conservative brethren also think a man can wear ladies jeans.
|

05-22-2017, 10:27 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
|
|
|
Re: More on Skirts
EB, tell us about all those pants commonly worn by men as common attire throughout Judea.
|

05-22-2017, 10:45 PM
|
|
Saved by Grace
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Decatur, TX
Posts: 5,247
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Esaias
1 Corinthians 6:9-10 KJV (9) Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, (10) Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
No crossdressing mentioned there.
1 Timothy 1:8-11 KJV But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully; (9) Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, (10) For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine; (11) According to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, which was committed to my trust.
If crossdressing is mentioned there, then are you saying the law was made for crossdressers? Where in the law is crossdressing prohibited? Oh, that's right - Deuteronomy 22:5. Bada bing bada boom? Sure, whatever.
Romans 1:24-32 KJV Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: (25) Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. (26) For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: (27) And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. (28) And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; (29) Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, (30) Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, (31) Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: (32) Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
Where is crossdressing mentioned here? Let met tell you - it's not mentioned there.
You think crossdressers are sodomites? Do you realise that approximately 50% if not more of the male crossdressing (drag queen) community are heterosexual? You knew that, right? Cause you study all that exter bibleekuhl dater, doncha?
Please, try again. You have used up 1 of three attempts at basic reasoning. If you need assistance, press 1 for more options. Have a nice day!
|
So you guys hermeneutic doesn't allow you to deduce from the texts that clearly condemn not only homosexuality, but effeminancy, that cross dressing is wrong.
Somehow, you want to affirm that cross dressing can only be wrong if Deut 22:5 means pants on a woman, and that just because some people who dress in drag claim to be heterosexual, that adds something to your case?
Oh and "gay apostolics".
It's weak.
__________________
"Resolved: That all men should live to the glory of God. Resolved, secondly: That whether or not anyone else does, I will." ~Jonathan Edwards
"The only man who has the right to say he is justified by grace alone is the man who has left all to follow Christ." ~Dietrich Bonheoffer, The Cost of Discipleship
"Preachers who should be fishing for men are now too often fishing for compliments from men." ~Leonard Ravenhill
|

05-23-2017, 12:32 AM
|
 |
Unvaxxed Pureblood
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Zion aka TEXAS
Posts: 26,945
|
|
|
Re: More on Skirts
This thread is now officially dumb.
|

05-23-2017, 08:14 AM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,678
|
|
|
Re: More on Skirts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason B
So you guys hermeneutic doesn't allow you to deduce from the texts that clearly condemn not only homosexuality, but effeminancy, that cross dressing is wrong.
Somehow, you want to affirm that cross dressing can only be wrong if Deut 22:5 means pants on a woman, and that just because some people who dress in drag claim to be heterosexual, that adds something to your case?
Oh and "gay apostolics".
It's weak.
|
What is truly weak, in fact completely and conspicuously absent, is your ability to provide ONE scripture where a godly woman wore pants.
Still waiting for the vacuum to be filled with Biblical evidence.
Thank you.
|

05-22-2017, 11:14 PM
|
|
Saved by Grace
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Decatur, TX
Posts: 5,247
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa
No, just send you to hell for being obnoxiously dumb. 
|
So God is going to send me to hell for being obnoxiously dumb?
Behold, true holiness.
Your postings are filled insults through and through to people. You impugn their motives, denigrate their experiences, project their feelings, completely misrepresent essentially anything they say, while mocking the strawmen you build, and this of course has been you MO for years. But of course its alright, because your religious system allows it. You dress right, and therefore you are right. Doing is the name of the game. So I'm sure you've earned enough brownie points with all those good works, that God isn't too upset when you blast people or talk about them going to hell for frivolous reasons like wearing slacks or simply annoying you. After all its a just punishment, and thank God you're not like those sinners or even tax collectors. List off your good works, so that God may be reminded how privileged He is to have you as His representative.
I, like Aquila, am glad you are here representing the conservative "apostolic" cause. You play it up well. Holiness is all about what you do and don't do, wear or not wear, go or not go. Check all those boxes, and you can be as mean, prideful, slanderous as you'd like. Perfect.
__________________
"Resolved: That all men should live to the glory of God. Resolved, secondly: That whether or not anyone else does, I will." ~Jonathan Edwards
"The only man who has the right to say he is justified by grace alone is the man who has left all to follow Christ." ~Dietrich Bonheoffer, The Cost of Discipleship
"Preachers who should be fishing for men are now too often fishing for compliments from men." ~Leonard Ravenhill
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:22 AM.
| |