More on Skirts

[Aquila]

One must remember that in biblical times, clothing for males and females was different only in styles and details, not in kind. While it undoubtedly is true that God wants some sexual distinction apparent in men’s and women’s garments, it is not legitimate to say that all women’s “pants” are wrong, or, for that matter, that Scottish “kilts” are sinful for the men of that culture.

[Pliny]

Originally Posted by Aquila

One must remember that in biblical times, clothing for males and females was different only in styles and details, not in kind. While it undoubtedly is true that God wants some sexual distinction apparent in men’s and women’s garments, it is not legitimate to say that all women’s “pants” are wrong, or, for that matter, that Scottish “kilts” are sinful for the men of that culture.

Yep... Aquila wears the dress and his wife wears the pants...

Deu. 22:5 is clear. Women are not to wear clothes that pertain to men.
Biblically, godly men wore pants. Godly women did not.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Pliny

Yep... Aquila wears the dress and his wife wears the pants...

Deu. 22:5 is clear. Women are not to wear clothes that pertain to men.
Biblically, godly men wore pants. Godly women did not.

Um, son... I actually wear the pants in my family. And they aint the pretty little pink one's that you insist pertain to you.

If you wear a pretty pink pair of ladies jeans, and prance all around your favorite little church, you're in violation of Deuteronomy 22:5 because you are wearing that which pertains to a woman. If you wear a pretty pink dress, and prance all around you favorite little church, you're in violation of Deuteronomy 22:5. PERIOD. END OF SUBJECT. PROVEN.

Now, let me hear you argue as to why you should be able to wear petty pink ladies pants because they supposedly pertain to you.

It's common sense.

[Pliny]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Um, son... I actually wear the pants in my family. And they aint the pretty little pink one's that you insist pertain to you.

If you wear a pretty pink pair of ladies jeans, and prance all around your favorite little church, you're in violation of Deuteronomy 22:5 because you are wearing that which pertains to a woman. If you wear a pretty pink dress, and prance all around you favorite little church, you're in violation of Deuteronomy 22:5. PERIOD. END OF SUBJECT. PROVEN.

Now, let me hear you argue as to why you should be able to wear petty pink ladies pants because they supposedly pertain to you.

It's common sense.

I'm not your son.
You STILL have not demonstrated where a godly women wore pants. Please try the Bible and try again.

Thank you

[Esaias]

Well, one thing is for certain:

If women can wear pants without being in violation of Deuteronomy 22:5, nobody on AFF (at least) has the wherewithal to prove it.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Well, one thing is for certain:

If women can wear pants without being in violation of Deuteronomy 22:5, nobody on AFF (at least) has the wherewithal to prove it.

If you wear a pretty pink pair of ladies jeans, and prance all around your favorite little church, you're in violation of Deuteronomy 22:5 because you are wearing that which pertains to a woman. PERIOD. END OF SUBJECT. PROVEN.

Now, let me hear you argue as to why you should be able to wear petty pink ladies pants because they supposedly pertain to you.

It's common sense.

[Aquila]

It is written:

Deuteronomy 22:5 (KJV)
The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God.

Both of these articles of clothing pertain to a woman. Any man would be in violation of the above text if he were to wear either one.

It's common sense.

[Pliny]

Originally Posted by Aquila

It is written:

Deuteronomy 22:5 (KJV)
The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God.

Both of these articles of clothing pertain to a woman. Any man would be in violation of the above text if he were to wear either one.

It's common sense.

Nice to know YOUR OPINION trumps the Bible.

I think I will stick with God's word.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Pliny

Nice to know YOUR OPINION trumps the Bible.

I think I will stick with God's word.

Ah, someone else who doesn't understand that pink ladies jeans aren't for them. Lol

[Pliny]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Ah, someone else who doesn't understand that pink ladies jeans aren't for them. Lol

Ohhh, that was an impressive remark.

STILL WAITING for your evidence