Not sure you guys have seen this:
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/23
Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19
Just to bring some transparency into this.
* The Journal name seems to show some "reputation" but it really has none. Scientific journals, magazines, and conferences are ranked. They use basically two systems: SJR and Impact Factor. The ranking is based, among other things, how the magazine, journals, or conference articles are cited by other scientific articles. FYI, I do have articles published in high ranking scientific journals and conferences.
* The Journal does not have even one year of age.
* One of the authors is a CS researcher. It is not his field. However, you could see cross-discipline articles if there is a cross-discipline problem. I see no computing science involvement in the article, for things like, e.g. simulations. It is weird to begin with.
* The Acknowledgement section is almost like a joke: "This research was funded in part by Quanta Computers, Inc., Taiwan, under the auspices of the Qmulus project"
I think "Greg Nigh" could have done better publishing a personal blog post, or even an interview.
The article content has very good points.
The Journal seems to have good intentions, read the inaugural issue:
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/issue/view/1
Take everything in there with a grain of salt, as you may see some biased exaggerations. That being said, taking into account the current fanaticism with the vaccine, you should take with a grain of salt everything from the other side as well, even from high ranking magazines and journals. Humans have bias, and societal pressure is a thing. It is best to always support dissenting voices, especially those with good argumentation. It is the safest thing to do when it comes to Science.