|
Tab Menu 1
| The Tab Cutting edge news of what is happening in Apostolic Oneness Pentecost today! |
 |
|

12-19-2007, 10:24 PM
|
 |
Communion at AFF
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,396
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Felicity
Some have been predicting this kind of separation for a number of years now.
However, I believe that whatever happens and whatever develops will not have the strength of the original merger and what developed from that; namely, the UPCI.
It will be interesting to see what happens. What is built on the Rock will stand. What is built on 'sand' will be less than secure or stable for sure.
There are divine moves of God that fit into his overall will and purpose. I totally and fully believe in the sovereignty of God. Nothing happens except by and according to His design and plan that was set in motion before time began.
So it could be that this new Tulsa thing could be part of God's plan to achieve some end or purpose that you and I aren't fully aware of at this point. OR ... it might could be the will and plan of a group of men motivated by less than pure motive and unction of the Holy Ghost.
|
Now, Sis, THIS is the insight that is needed here in this thread. Exactly, this fellowship could be a tool to be used by God for some purpose. The UPCI has gone through several phases since its inception and is not exactly what it was when it was formed.
Is the opposite possible? Possibly but there has been plenty of conjecture that this is the case and so the point you mentioned above should get more press. Sadly, here, I don't think it will.
__________________
"Some may call me foolish, some may call me odd; but I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man than a fool in the eyes of God..."
|

12-20-2007, 10:46 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 169
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kings Kid
Its coming apart at the the seams because of the deceit. Because the ultra cons want to keep things old school.
|
These cats are not ultra cons by a LONG shot. Most of them are not even cons
|

12-19-2007, 06:36 PM
|
 |
Incredible India
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ca
Posts: 6,044
|
|
|
Can someone clarify as why a name of a minister(or minsters') would be used to endorse a group without the minister's knowledge??
|

12-19-2007, 06:39 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,289
|
|
|
I am disappointed because I was thinking the Tulsa movement is exactly what the UPC needs.
I hope they get it worked out and doesn't end up like Donald Trump's USFL.
|

12-19-2007, 06:45 PM
|
 |
Invisible Thad
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,966
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carpenter
I am disappointed because I was thinking the Tulsa movement is exactly what the UPC needs.
I hope they get it worked out and doesn't end up like Donald Trump's USFL.
|
Exactly what the UPC needs?? Why is that ?
|

12-19-2007, 07:41 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,289
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thad
Exactly what the UPC needs?? Why is that ?
|
Thad, you know as well as I that the U in the UPC is anything but United. If the Tulsa movement leads to stability, union, continuity on both sides of the spectrum, why not yearn for it? I think the UPC is ripe and ready for a shakeup in order to move forward and become more stable.
|

12-19-2007, 07:50 PM
|
 |
His word burns in my heart like a fire...Fire Fall Down
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,853
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carpenter
Thad, you know as well as I that the U in the UPC is anything but United. If the Tulsa movement leads to stability, union, continuity on both sides of the spectrum, why not yearn for it? I think the UPC is ripe and ready for a shakeup in order to move forward and become more stable.
|
Good thoughts.
|

12-19-2007, 08:30 PM
|
 |
Accepts all friends requests
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,609
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carpenter
Thad, you know as well as I that the U in the UPC is anything but United. If the Tulsa movement leads to stability, union, continuity on both sides of the spectrum, why not yearn for it? I think the UPC is ripe and ready for a shakeup in order to move forward and become more stable.
|
I agree, however the Tulsa group don't really appear to represent that "UC" block. At least the list of names in both Councils cover almost as broad a spectrum as the UPC itself.
So what's the motive? it's not like the TV issue has split the org, nor holiness standards.
|

12-20-2007, 11:09 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeanie
Can someone clarify as why a name of a minister(or minsters') would be used to endorse a group without the minister's knowledge??
|
It's possible that these individual ministers are getting such negative feed back that they are "changing their tune" and arguing that they really weren't in this afterall. I think the spirit of division, secrecy, and lies is playing games with these brethren. They're so focused on television they've allowed the enemy to play a different game with them entirely.
|

12-19-2007, 06:59 PM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 490
|
|
|
Do any of you have any proof, or documentation for these accusations, or are you just engaging in more talebearing and gossip.
Oh, wait this is Thads Tab...thats all that goes on here.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:13 AM.
| |