Is The Serpent Seed Doctrine A "Damnable Heresy"?

Originally Posted by Sabellius

I'm certain that it is. This does though decrease your credibility because if that there even a thousand opinions (forget billions) like mine, about yourself, then that should actually tell you something about yourself.

You seem to be thoroughly confused, but what exactly do you believe on that issue. Then again, even the issue of Calvinism/Armenianism is multi faceted. We could be talking about free-will or limited atonement? What does your "view" say of either?

Not Hyper Calvin anyhow... my difference is FOREKNOWLEDGE

Originally Posted by Sabellius

I'm certain that it is. This does though decrease your credibility because if that there even a thousand opinions (forget billions) like mine, about yourself, then that should actually tell you something about yourself.

You seem to be thoroughly confused, but what exactly do you believe on that issue. Then again, even the issue of Calvinism/Armenianism is multi faceted. We could be talking about free-will or limited atonement? What does your "view" say of either?

I assure you there would be as many opinions against your stances as well.. you see its the game of religion

[TRFrance]

Originally Posted by Sabellius

Good point. That is probably a similar character trait amongst his peers too. Have you followed some of the links? I have. These guys are trying to be pentecostal popes. The burden of proof never shifts, because there is always another spiritual or allegorical explanation....

"Pentecostal popes" , huh?

Interesting phraseology, my brother. Me likey.
I might have to steal that one.
.
.
.
(adding it to my rhetorical toolbox as we speak)

[revrandy]

"Prophet" dies...Church is out of lucK???

[Rico]

We now have at least two people with first hand knowledge of some of the stuff being taught by these Branhamites, and DV will not acknowledge it as fact.

Originally Posted by Rico

We now have at least two people with first hand knowledge of some of the stuff being taught by these Branhamites, and DV will not acknowledge it as fact.

and these two people will not PROVE it as fact..... are we now to accept as fact the testimonies of Apostolic men who are antagonistic towards Bro. Branham? Is that the shallowness of this boards demand of proof for ALL THINGS?

Becuase someone said it.., it is now fact? I have asked for proof sooooo many times and it never comes

[Rico]

Originally Posted by Dr. Vaughn

and these two people will not PROVE it as fact..... are we now to accept as fact the testimonies of Apostolic men who are antagonistic towards Bro. Branham? Is that the shallowness of this boards demand of proof for ALL THINGS?

Becuase someone said it.., it is now fact? I have asked for proof sooooo many times and it never comes

Brother Epley is NOT a liar! Furthermore, according to St. Mark, this is something that affected his own family. Why would he make that up? These are two posters who have been associated with this forum (including its predecessors) for years. As far as I am concerned, it is you who has to prove their claims as being false, not the other way around. Credibility means something on these forums.

Originally Posted by Rico

Brother Epley is NOT a liar! Furthermore, according to St. Mark, this is something that affected his own family. Why would he make that up? These are two posters who have been associated with this forum (including its predecessors) for years. As far as I am concerned, it is you who has to prove their claims as being false, not the other way around. Credibility means something on these forums.

OK,, you want proof of the opposite? What will you do with it? Would you be fair? is it in you?

So your asking me to prove St. Marks falsehood.. when he stated that Bro. Branham taught he would be resurrected.. and when he said Bro. branham taught that our salvation was in believing the prophet???

before I do so.. and it will only take 10 seconds..... what will you do when I prove he never said those things.. and actually said the opposite

[Rico]

Originally Posted by Dr. Vaughn

OK,, you want proof of the opposite? What will you do with it? Would you be fair? is it in you?

So your asking me to prove St. Marks falsehood.. when he stated that Bro. Branham taught he would be resurrected.. and when he said Bro. branham taught that our salvation was in believing the prophet???

before I do so.. and it will only take 10 seconds..... what will you do when I prove he never said those things.. and actually said the opposite

Your 10 seconds are up.

[StMark]

Originally Posted by Dr. Vaughn

OK,, you want proof of the opposite? What will you do with it? Would you be fair? is it in you?

So your asking me to prove St. Marks falsehood.. when he stated that Bro. Branham taught he would be resurrected.. and when he said Bro. branham taught that our salvation was in believing the prophet???

before I do so.. and it will only take 10 seconds..... what will you do when I prove he never said those things.. and actually said the opposite

Vaughn I promise you these are not my falsehoods! these came from "Believers" or "the message" as they referred.

I believe Bro Epley can verify everything I've said. We can't all be lying. I'm not making this up this is what THEY said!!!!!!!!

It is Absolutley TRUE that many of them believed they were Theophanies of bible characters just has William believed of himself.