What Would You Say?

[Monkeyman]

Originally Posted by theoldpaths

Didn't say the founders were and didn't say the older latinos were either.

No, YOU said facial hair is rebellion, do I need to repost it?

[theoldpaths]

Originally Posted by Monkeyman

No, YOU said facial hair is rebellion, do I need to repost it?

I said that a social revolution occurred around the 50's and 60's where men grew long hair on their heads and on their faces as a deliberate sign and act of rebellion against established authority.

[berkeley]

Originally Posted by theoldpaths

I said that a social revolution occurred around the 50's and 60's where men grew long hair on their heads and on their faces as a deliberate sign and act of rebellion against established authority.

And that movement has died... but you people give it life!

[Monkeyman]

Originally Posted by theoldpaths

I said that a social revolution occurred around the 50's and 60's where men grew long hair on their heads and on their faces as a deliberate sign and act of rebellion against established authority.

But....before the 50's the UPC/AOG/PAW founders had facial hair!!!!!!!! So no rebellion there. Get it??? You're adding man.

[jaxfam6]

Originally Posted by theoldpaths

I said that a social revolution occurred around the 50's and 60's where men grew long hair on their heads and on their faces as a deliberate sign and act of rebellion against established authority.

So by this statement you are saying that because of something that happened in the 50's and 60's the rules could be changed but because of something that happened in the 40's things couldn't change.

In the 40's women started working and the wearing of pants became more evident but that is not okay to continue in.
On the other hand because of a rebellion against established authority in the 50's and 60's it is now no longer feasible for men to have facial hair.
So we can change things as some men see fit but not others.

Okay well thanks for the clarification on that.

[Monkeyman]

Are you Apostolic??? Have you seen the pictures from the early part of the last century and seen the facial hair of YOUR leaders??? Were they in rebellion??? To whom??

[Monkeyman]

Do you think every culture looks like a 1960 IBM boardroom, and THAT's what the Good Book says 2,000 years ago? Was that the look back then? So, where do you get facial hair is rebellion???

Now, I agree, if you go to a church, and the pastor asks you to shave and you don't, THAT is rebellion. I also don't think you have to stay there...

[Monkeyman]

Old Paths...I am Acts 2:38, three steps, water baptized and a tongue talker ALL of the time, my wife wears dresses, doesn't cut her hair, I keep mine short...usually, I shave before church and work...usually....that don't mean nothing compared to HIS grace and the Cross. Don't ADD to the WORD bro, it can handle it's own business!

[berkeley]

Originally Posted by Monkeyman

Old Paths...I am Acts 2:38, three steps, water baptized and a tongue talker ALL of the time, my wife wears dresses, doesn't cut her hair, I keep mine short...usually, I shave before church and work...usually....that don't mean nothing compared to HIS grace and the Cross. Don't ADD to the WORD bro

soon you will be charismatic...

[Monkeyman]

Originally Posted by Berkeley

soon you will be charismatic...

Well I have been this way for 42 years and IIIIII ain't changed yet??? Someone has to hold on bro!