Letter from Bro. Chester Wright to Bro. Haney - Page 17

Indy · #1 08-27-2008, 09:53 AM

does mj sign the as?

if so isn't that enough?

Amos · #2 08-27-2008, 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indy

does mj sign the as?

if so isn't that enough?

LOL!

I think we have just marched off the map.

Y'all have fun.

Indy · #3 08-27-2008, 10:01 AM

i c how this unfolds

cw is afraid that the same soft 1 step movement has taken another form

this is more of the same

mj may be a 1 step guy and may influence others so this is the danger he calls to light

i get it now

thnks for clarification

mizpeh · #4 08-27-2008, 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indy

i c how this unfolds

cw is afraid that the same soft 1 step movement has taken another form

this is more of the same

mj may be a 1 step guy and may influence others so this is the danger he calls to light

i get it now

thnks for clarification

You know what the scary part of this is? MJ may teach Acts 2:28 as essential and may truly maintain a separation unto God that might put some UC's to shame but this email has called his ministry into question without substantiated charges! CW may not have his facts straight or the person who reported this to CW may be inaccurate!

Indy · #5 08-27-2008, 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mizpeh

You know what the scary part of this is? MJ may teach Acts 2:28 as essential and may truly maintain a separation unto God that might put some UC's to shame but this email has called his ministry into question without substantiated charges! It may be all hearsay!

like i said

same witch hunt different jungle

heresy hunters R us at work

Michael Phelps · #6 08-27-2008, 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mizpeh

You know what the scary part of this is? MJ may teach Acts 2:28 as essential and may truly maintain a separation unto God that might put some UC's to shame but this email has called his ministry into question without substantiated charges! CW may not have his facts straight or the person who reported this to CW may be inaccurate!

If he's preaching Acts 2:28, he's preaching this:

28Thou hast made known to me the ways of life; thou shalt make me full of joy with thy countenance.

And, I'm pretty sure THAT'S essential!

mizpeh · #7 08-27-2008, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael Phelps

If he's preaching Acts 2:28, he's preaching this:

28Thou hast made known to me the ways of life; thou shalt make me full of joy with thy countenance.

And, I'm pretty sure THAT'S essential!

you know what I meant! ACts 2:38!

Michael Phelps · #8 08-27-2008, 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mizpeh

you know what I meant! ACts 2:38!

Sister, I'm just helping you stay on the straight and narrow! It would be a shame to go to hell over a typo!!!!!!!

(That right thar will preach!!)

rgcraig · #9 08-27-2008, 10:14 AM

Shoot, now I'm going to have to break down and read that LONG letter.

Nahum · #10 08-27-2008, 10:52 AM

Amos is The Borg at its very best.

He isn't quite sure what it is he doesn't like about MJ, but has decided to run him down on an internet forum anyway, because his friends don't like him.

He has questioned MJ's belief in the New Birth and accused him of being liberal by asserting he has moved away from essential standards (whatever that means).

Say, isn't Chester Wright the same guy who wrote the article in favor of television ads last year?

Isn't he the one that The Borg villified?

Isn't Chester Wright last year's whipping boy?

I guess Amos and his crew just need a new whipping boy.

This year it's Mark Johnston.

At some point we need to recognize Amos' tactics for what they are. His tactic are divisive, destructive political assassinations of other members of the body of Christ who express minute differences of opinion from "Ole Time Pennycost."

I wonder at this.

I am amazed at this.

I do not pretend to understand this.

But I have watched Amos and his posse for two years now, and they never change.