|
Re: HMD, Coon & DKB recognize past failures
Quote:
Originally Posted by freeatlast
Still wearing that which pertaineth to the man.
Don't get me wrong here...I do not endorse in any way the apostolics intrepretation of Dt 22:5
It is in no way refering to a women wearing a pair of pants in our culture.
I'm just saying IF you really believe it forbids wearing slacks by women then HOW can they think it's OK to to wear if coverd by a dress??
|
That which pertains to a man is pants without a skirt on over them. That which pertains to a woman is a skirt with or without pants on under them. It's easy enough to explain it this way. It doesn't have to be about believing it forbids slacks on a woman, but instead it can be that it forbids a woman from only wearing slacks with no skirt on over them.
__________________
You better watch out before I blitzkrieg your thread cause I'm the Thread Nazi now!
Last edited by jfrog; 08-10-2010 at 10:46 AM.
|
Threaded Mode
