Maybe having an "attitude" about men is what makes them seem like donkeys to you that feel that way about them.
I've never felt that way about men, generally speaking. Sure there are some men that are hard on the head but there are definitely women that the description could apply to for sure.
I think that men need women's respect. They're not perfect but neither are women.
__________________ Smiles & Blessings.... ~Felicity Welsh~ (surname courtesy of Jim Yohe)
Maybe having an "attitude" about men is what makes them seem like donkeys to you that feel that way about them.
I've never felt that way about men, generally speaking. Sure there are some men that are hard on the head but there are definitely women that the description could apply to for sure.
I think that men need women's respect. They're not perfect but neither are women.
I'm just having fun, it's my nature. Besides, my husbands more like a bear than a donkey. (again.. just having some fun)
I'm waiting for a man to post the "...continual dripping" scripture!
__________________ Mrs. LPW
Psalm 19:14
Let the words of my mouth, and the meditation of my heart, be acceptable in thy sight, O LORD, my strength, and my redeemer.
Maybe having an "attitude" about men is what makes them seem like donkeys to you that feel that way about them.
I've never felt that way about men, generally speaking. Sure there are some men that are hard on the head but there are definitely women that the description could apply to for sure.
I think that men need women's respect. They're not perfect but neither are women.
I agree sis! There are men out there that i , um question... but they are far from me. I am blessed to be married to a wonderful man who treats me like a queen! I had a wonderful father and I am a daddy's girl! It's hard for me to have the "dogg the men" attitude... ...but there are some...!LOL
__________________
I never met a chocolate I didn't like!
*sigh* I did nothing yesterday.... I wasn't finished so I did nothing again today!
For a reply to Stephen Hoover:
I have no need to name names, because I did not attack any "perceived" segment of individuals. The writer of this letter did so attack, so he is placing every individual of this segment under the same indictment.
For Chuck Tatum
I do not know why you need my name, since I have not attacked anyone or defamed anyone.
If you really need my name, go read the article on Bro Alvear and see who had the privilege of being with this precious man, today.
It seems that both of you are defending a tenuous position, since you call for me to name names, and identify myself, but do not call for the writer of the letter to do the same!
or
Maybe you were just being ironic!