Is The Serpent Seed Doctrine A "Damnable Heresy"?

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by Dr. Vaughn

Bro. Vayle is not Bro. Branham... I have countless quotes where Bro. Branham explained it WAS BY FOREKNOWLEDGE... you know we could fill this little box up with those quotes

I know you could it was quite confusing however the CAB clearly states the opposite and also the Isreal series. Branham endorsed and sent out hte book as somewhat a statement of doctrine to what he believed that was the reason for the book. EVERY page and paragraph had his initials on them. Again this came directly from Vayle who wrote it and Green who published it.
I think Branham was confused myself. Dale later printed a paper that had multitude of quotes that taught foreknowledge and free will. It was quite war in the late 60's a war of quotes. However YOU even quoted from the CAB and said it changed your life so Vayle won!

[bkstokes]

This issue of Jeus' humanity coming from Mary has been a big debate throughout history. This is one of the reasons why Mary was eventually venerated in the catholic church.

Sorry I have added this late, but I was not around to plug it in while others were talking about this point.

Bro. Stokes... you post was most informative.... thanks for bringing that to the table

[Scott Hutchinson]

It is not God's will for any to perish if absolute predstination is correct,then you have people being borned who cannot be saved.Man can decide to believe on Christ or reject Him.
Yes I know a person must be drawn by the Spirit before they can repent, and yes Grace is soverign but I can't see God predestinating someone to be eternally lost.
And no the serpent didn't get Eve hot.

Originally Posted by Scott Hutchinson

It is not God's will for any to perish if absolute predstination is correct,then you have people being borned who cannot be saved.Man can decide to believe on Christ or reject Him.
Yes I know a person must be drawn by the Spirit before they can repent, and yes Grace is soverign but I can't see God predestinating someone to be eternally lost.
And no the serpent didn't get Eve hot.

Jesus prayed for all of his discples,.... except "that one who was BORN the Son of Hell"

[bkstokes]

What I find funny is that DV hasn't even voted for his own doctrine. In fact, no one has voted and said that they think it is biblical truth.

[SDG]

I'm still waiting for Elder Epley or Dr. Vaughn to tell me where this terminology of a blood cell and the doctrine taught using said terminology spawns from ... there is no such biblical teaching on it ....

Dr. Vaughn, you went on a tirade about the term "drunk in the Spirit" ... yet commend brother Branahm for a term and subsequent teaching that has no biblical or scientific backing.

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

I'm still waiting for Elder Epley or Dr. Vaughn to tell me where this terminology of a blood cell and the doctrine taught using said terminology spawns from ... there is no such biblical teaching on it ....

Dr. Vaughn, you went on a tirade about the term "drunk in the Spirit" ... yet commend brother Branahm for a term and subsequent teaching that has no biblical or scientific backing.

Acts 20:28.

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Acts 20:28.

Now Brother.... that was smooth as silk

[pelathais]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Acts 20:28.

Originally Posted by Dr. Vaughn

Now Brother.... that was smooth as silk

The blood of God mentioned in Acts 20:28 is the same blood of God mentioned in Ephesians 1:7 and (and elsewhere). Colossians 1:4 tells us that the blood that purchases us was the blood of "his dear Son" which seems to be making a distinction between the Divine and the human when read together with verse 3.

The blood that paid for our redemption was entirely human blood. Anything else and you've got Teke's Gnostic dualism coming back into play.