Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jay
I do not support the house church movement as such. Everything I have read leads me to believe that they tend to be temporary rather unstable. Also, they seem to reject the idea of any spiritual authority and accountablility. I am not saying that all do, but that tends to be the attitude of the ones that I have talked to that left 'established' churches.
|
They can seem temporary, but the philosophy is different. You see, a house church isn't focused on membership and establishment. They are way stations on the journey of personal salvation and spiritual growth. Many fade because they are not networked. I'd steer clear of a house church that isn't networked with others or a larger body.
One thing I know is manny hurt purple go to house church. Sometimes authority is feared. However, a healthy house church is more like a family than a corporation with a CEO. Elders are spiritual fathers, not little lords over the people. As a father counsels their children, but allow for choices that they may not easily support, so do house church elders. Also, as a father, elders counsel and guide through the consequences of their children's choices with love.
Lastly, house churches are rooted in the doctrine of the priesthood of all believers. Elders therefore are equals with a mentoring and guiding ministry through the pastoral gift. They are not men in a superior "position" to control others.
I hope that adds a bit of perspective.
God bless.