Quote:
Originally Posted by jfrog
You're the one contradicting yourself. You first said they couldn't have a funeral because there was no remains, nothing to bury. Now you're saying they can have a funeral with an empty casket if they wish which must mean they don't wish to.
|
No frog... I said they often DO NOT HAVE A FUNERAL... not that they can't. I've also said that many people feel a funeral an expensive obligation and if they can avoid one they will... Easier to do if not everyone is aware that there has been a loss.
But regardless... if there is one set of standards for a miscarriage, another set for a stillbirth and yet others for a child, young person, adult and the very aged... Well the bottom line is that it still changes nothing about whether or not they are a person. You have attempted to set up a fallacy in that if they are treated differently that somehow proves that they have less worth when it does not.
I have simply tried over and over to show you that different families, ethnicities, socioeconomic groups, etc. have different parameters then what is your norm, which appears to be a funeral for all dead humans. Most of us don't do that... we only do funerals when the public would be interested to see the persons final arrangements. Otherwise it is a private matter. There is variance on both sides of that and I've tried to show it...
But really it is all futile discussion as it changes not that a human is a human from it's inception in the mind of God even prior to it's conception here on earth. I believe that God knew each of us in His foreknowledge... So do you also not believe in an omniscient, omnipotent God, frog?