"The Giant Sucking Sound"

Old Paths · #1 09-28-2007, 10:59 AM

As Ross (Can't win, but I will run anyway) Perot said back in 1992 "NAFTA will create a giant sucking sound" as USA jobs go south to Mexico.

So will the passing of Resolution 4 cause "a giant sucking sound" as ministers that feel betrayed by the org. leave the UPC for other orgs. or the vast world of Good Independent Brethren. (GIBs).

Digging4Truth · #2 09-28-2007, 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old Paths

As Ross (Can't win, but I will run anyway) Perot said back in 1992 "NAFTA will create a giant sucking sound" as USA jobs go south to Mexico.

So will the passing of Resolution 4 cause "a giant sucking sound" as ministers that feel betrayed by the org. leave the UPC for other orgs. or the vast world of Good Independent Brethren. (GIBs).

Now I find that interesting that brethren would feel betrayed by the org when they have not been forced to do anything.

Nothing whatsoever changes for those who do not want to use the medium.

#3 09-28-2007, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Digging4Truth

Now I find that interesting that brethren would feel betrayed by the org when they have not been forced to do anything.

Nothing whatsoever changes for those who do not want to use the medium.

For many I believe it is an issue of not wanting to be identified with this medium in any way... especially organizationally.

Digging4Truth · #4 09-28-2007, 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philjones

For many I believe it is an issue of not wanting to be identified with this medium in any way... especially organizationally.

Ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh....

I see that... a little...

#5 09-28-2007, 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Digging4Truth

Ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh....

I see that... a little...

If you identify yourself as "UPCI" and they stand for something which you are vehemently against... how does that make you look?

BobDylan · #6 09-28-2007, 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philjones

If you identify yourself as "UPCI" and they stand for something which you are vehemently against... how does that make you look?

They upci is not standing up for television, imo... they are simply allowing the use of it as a method of communication. The only think the upci is standing up for is the cause of the gospel... I wish poeple would quit being "against" things, and be FOR something! Too many people's ministries are defined by what they are agiainst... let's stand up and be for the gospel!

Old Paths · #7 09-28-2007, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philjones

For many I believe it is an issue of not wanting to be identified with this medium in any way... especially organizationally.

Amen, Brother, AMEN.

Hoovie · #8 09-28-2007, 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philjones

For many I believe it is an issue of not wanting to be identified with this medium in any way... especially organizationally.

Possibly because they have unfairly attacked or slandered those who watch TV in the past??

Old Paths · #9 09-28-2007, 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Digging4Truth

Now I find that interesting that brethren would feel betrayed by the org when they have not been forced to do anything.

Nothing whatsoever changes for those who do not want to use the medium.

Imagine a pastor that has been totally against the use of TV and a non church going friend tells him that they saw an ad to "visit the United Pentecostal Church near you".

And he knows that his money has help pay for the ad.

Digging4Truth · #10 09-28-2007, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old Paths

Imagine a pastor that has been totally against the use of TV and a non church going friend tells him that they saw an ad to "visit the United Pentecostal Church near you".

And he knows that his money has help pay for the ad.

Just asking questions... not challenging you...

How will his money pay for the ad?

Is the org going to make it's own ads?