Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley
I understand particularly you last observation. I have never understood why someone would be reluctant to use the language used by the writers of the Bible. Since I am certain in my concept of the Godhead I use the terms freely as used in scripture without doing injustice to the Oneness of God. However Jakes intent I feel is to accomodate without clarity for he knows clarity would be his enemy and not his friend.
|
Good post. I agree with your analysis and it applies to both TD Jakes and Christ Church.
I happen to agree with it though. If you believe, as I do, that the differences in trinitarian and Oneness theology are not a matter of heaven or hell then you can afford to be non confrontational with your differences from conventional Christian theology regarding the godhead.
I think it is possible that this stance opens some doors to people considering altering their views than sometimes the hardcore position does.
I am pleased that T.D. Jakes statement says that he 100% of the time baptizes in the name of Jesus per scripture.
I think slowly but surely many of these exUPCers are making an impact in Christendom. I don't see the rabid (to use an rkentsmith word) opposition to baptism in Jesus name as much as I used to. Even TBN has softened it's hardline against it as so many exUPCers associated with them now apparently have had an impact. (BTW channel surfing a couple of days ago and saw Steve Munsey. He looks awful. I wonder what happened to his face.)