The Indian people were quite shocked to see him using a teleprompter ,they thought by looking at him swiveling his head back and forth, he was trained in how to speak to mass audiences by making eye contact: toofunny They didnt know he was just reading from both directions.Now they know what we know that he is just a phony, very poorly spoken and written kind of a guy that pulled the wool over a lot of peoples eyes,with the help of a fawning media !
It would be interesting if we could see the hand inside the BHO puppet.
Who is BHO? Where did he come from? Where was he born? What citizenship and passport did he use when he visited Pakistan? Who paid for his education? How did he so mysteriously arrive on the scene, speak at the Democratic convention 6 years ago, and rise so meteorically to the most powerful person in the world? Who programs him and puts their words into his mouth?
Location: In two of the most beautiful states in the U.S.A
Posts: 1,676
Re: Huckabee DEFENDS Obama's Trip To India!
Quote:
Originally Posted by tstew
I'm assuming that the next President will be using the newest technology as well. I would not expect the next President to step to the podium with a spiral notebook or 3x5 cards. I preach from my laptop. This is really not a big deal to me.
Location: In two of the most beautiful states in the U.S.A
Posts: 1,676
Re: Huckabee DEFENDS Obama's Trip To India!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam
It would be interesting if we could see the hand inside the BHO puppet.
Who is BHO? Where did he come from? Where was he born? What citizenship and passport did he use when he visited Pakistan? Who paid for his education? How did he so mysteriously arrive on the scene, speak at the Democratic convention 6 years ago, and rise so meteorically to the most powerful person in the world? Who programs him and puts their words into his mouth?
Good questions that will probably never be answered.
It would be interesting if we could see the hand inside the BHO puppet.
Who is BHO? Where did he come from? Where was he born? What citizenship and passport did he use when he visited Pakistan? Who paid for his education? How did he so mysteriously arrive on the scene, speak at the Democratic convention 6 years ago, and rise so meteorically to the most powerful person in the world? Who programs him and puts their words into his mouth?
Advisers put words in his mouth, just like every other President. Maybe even his wife helps him.
__________________
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
2 Chronicles 7:14 KJV
He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:8 KJV
Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 1 John 3:2 KJV
If you would read the article, you would understand that Huckabee determines that, regardless of the costs, for the President to have snubbed the Indians it woud have been a serious mistake.
Also, hasn't that 200 billion number already been debunked as most improbable?
Combat operations in Afghanistan for an entire year cost $190 billion!
I ask again, WHO suggested he should snub the Indians?
__________________ Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:
There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
Every sinner must repent of their sins.
That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
I ask again, WHO suggested he should snub the Indians?
A general critique that some conservatives had was that the trip was too expensive-- given the economic woes of our country.
Huckabee, Rush, Beck and others jumped on that bandwagon, citing that it would cost America $200 Billion, thus implying that it is an unnecessary squandering of tax-payer dollars.
That number was GROSSLY overpriced-- given that combat ops in Afganistan for last year topped at $190 Billion!
Huckabee back-peddled, admitting that the trip to India was very important for the President to make. When he admitted and emphasized the importance of the trip, he implied that the costs of said trip is not a squadering of tax-payer dollars, but a necessary expense, to ensure that our Indian ally not feel "snubbed" by the President backing out.
The critique of the President taking the trip was cetered on cost.
For him to not make the trip would have offended the Indians-- esspecially since this trip had been pre-scheduled.
In suggesting that the President should not make this trip because it would be too expensive, his critics were suggesting that the President "snub" a key ally.
If the President had cancelled his trip, regardless of the intent, the Indians would have felt "snubbed."
So do you understand now?
__________________
"The choices we make reveal the true nature of our character."
Linear Mode
