|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|
12-23-2010, 07:57 PM
|
 |
Genesis 11:10
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,385
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
So a guy could pretend he's gay and be allowed to shower with women. 
|
12-23-2010, 08:00 PM
|
|
Isaiah 56:4-5
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SOUTH ZION
Posts: 11,307
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Good news. Next step, give them civil ceremonies and allow their partners to have the same rights that a married couple would have.
|
12-23-2010, 10:02 PM
|
 |
Jesus' Name Pentecostal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: near Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,805
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arphaxad
UCMJ
ARTICLE 125. SODOMY
(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration , however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense.
(b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
 |
Won't that have to be repealed if gay marriage is recognized in the Military?
and
who decided that was "unnatural"?
|
12-23-2010, 10:03 PM
|
|
Jesus' Name Pentecostal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: near Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,805
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
So, what about GLBT?
How would that be accommodated with housing, showering, rest rooms, etc?
|
12-23-2010, 10:08 PM
|
|
Isaiah 56:4-5
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SOUTH ZION
Posts: 11,307
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
we don't know yet
|
12-23-2010, 10:19 PM
|
|
Inactive User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 80
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
No discussion on sleeping/showering accomodations, yet DADT was repealed and approved.
Health care form bill was never read through thoroughly (as we've discovered recently), yet it was signed into law.
I'm already seeing a problem here...
If something is going to be discussed in Washington, please for the sake of the people, read through it or plan the necessary accomodations before signing ANYTHING into law. And that goes for anything and everything. I'm right down the middle, hence my name TheIndependent.
Sincerely,
TheIndependent
|
12-23-2010, 10:26 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
I guess this is something I don't understand...Is it necessary to know someone is a homosexual before admitting him/her to the military?
|
I'd want to know if I was a fellow military person who is going to use showers and changing rooms where a homosexual would be. I would not want to be there! Sorry.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.
"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
|
12-23-2010, 11:07 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,754
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheIndependent
No discussion on sleeping/showering accomodations, yet DADT was repealed and approved.
Health care form bill was never read through thoroughly (as we've discovered recently), yet it was signed into law.
I'm already seeing a problem here...
If something is going to be discussed in Washington, please for the sake of the people, read through it or plan the necessary accomodations before signing ANYTHING into law. And that goes for anything and everything. I'm right down the middle, hence my name TheIndependent.
Sincerely,
TheIndependent
|
Well, they are already showering together now and there are no issues. What more is there to discuss? lol
Barney Frank had a good response to that question:
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/...-soldiers-must
|
12-23-2010, 11:09 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,754
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
And as to the original post, yes, it was necessary. There is no reason to discriminate against homosexuals serving in the military.
|
12-23-2010, 11:21 PM
|
 |
Go Dodgers!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,794
|
|
|
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandie
I think it is the same thing as allowing men to shower with the women.
I would feel extremley uncomfortable showering with a lesbian. And I'm sure there are men who will feel uncomfortable showering with homosexual men.
I think they're going to have to create homosexual and lesbian quarters. Like you pointed out, they already do so for men and women. I can't imagine someone isn't going to complain about showering with someone who is attracted to their gender.
|
But if there is a problem with gay men showering with straight there would be just as much with gay men showering with gay men...maybe straight men can shower with lesbians..except I doubt a lesbian wants a man leering at her
And for all they know they've already been showering with gay people
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:
- There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
- The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
- Every sinner must repent of their sins.
- That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
- That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
- The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:31 PM.
| |
Linear Mode
