Trump Twitter Ban and Sidney Kraken SUED

[n david]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

If you had been following the information and read through the actual lawsuits, you would have seen the evidence presented in the attached exhibits. That is how a lawsuit works. I am not doing all the legwork for you. Find them yourself and read through them.

And there have been Judges who have saw the "evidence" and ruled against them.

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

And BTW, bright eyes, if an election is online, it is a crime and voter fraud is being manipulated.

The election wasn't online. There was an accusation that a machine was connected to the internet. There has been no accusation, not even from Pulitzer, that there was any fraud in the runoff.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by n david

And there have been Judges who have saw the "evidence" and ruled against them.



The election wasn't online. There was an accusation that a machine was connected to the internet. There has been no accusation, not even from Pulitzer, that there was any fraud in the runoff.

The Georgia runoff was shown in REAL time that the election was online, you only need one machine hooked up to compromise them all. Do you read anything or just watch the news?

[n david]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

The Georgia runoff was shown in REAL time that the election was online, you only need one machine hooked up to compromise them all. Do you read anything or just watch the news?

If you read my previous post, you see I said I watched Pulitzer’s testimony. I also posted that Pulitzer didn’t offer any accusations of fraud but only said that one precinct had a machine connected to the internet.

I couldn’t very well post that without watching the testimony, now could I?

Also, I don’t watch the news. Not even FoxNews. I do read court opinions and a lot of various news sources. I’m not stupid, so stop the insinuations and insults.

I would ask if you read anything other than Sidney and the crazy Lin Wood?

[n david]

Being connected to the internet and actually engaging in fraud are two different things.

Pulitzer claimed his team found that a precinct had a machine connected to the internet. He notably did NOT claim any fraud was occurring.

[Jito463]

Originally Posted by n david

Being connected to the internet and actually engaging in fraud are two different things.

Pulitzer claimed his team found that a precinct had a machine connected to the internet. He notably did NOT claim any fraud was occurring.

There were clear violations of both the federal and state Constitutions.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by n david

Being connected to the internet and actually engaging in fraud are two different things.

Pulitzer claimed his team found that a precinct had a machine connected to the internet. He notably did NOT claim any fraud was occurring.

“It is communicating two ways in real time. That means it is receiving and sending data. That should never happen. Shouldn’t be WiFi. We have that now documented in real time. That is going on right there where everyone is voting. I just wanted to get that into the record.”

So, David, if it should not be happening that the poll pad is hooked up to WiFi and it IS sending and receiving data, where is your proof there is no fraud taking place? Because being hooked up to WiFi, sending and receiving data is proof there is.

Your argument is weak. But, hey, try to win that argument. You do you, David.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

“It is communicating two ways in real time. That means it is receiving and sending data. That should never happen. Shouldn’t be WiFi. We have that now documented in real time. That is going on right there where everyone is voting. I just wanted to get that into the record.”

So, David, if it should not be happening that the poll pad is hooked up to WiFi and it IS sending and receiving data, where is your proof there is no fraud taking place? Because being hooked up to WiFi, sending and receiving data is proof there is.

Try an experiment, PO. Connect something to your WiFi and just let it sit there. Now using another source, connect to your router and you’ll see that data is being both sent and received between the device and router via WiFi. You could leave it sit there all day and not touch it but there will be data going back and forth between the device and router.

I dont need to offer proof, I’m not the one make baseless accusations that not even Pulitzer would make.

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Your argument is weak. But, hey, try to win that argument. You do you, David.

My argument is weak? Ha! You’re the one with absolutely no proof or evidence. All you do is insult and insinuate that I’m stupid.

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

“It is communicating two ways in real time. That means it is receiving and sending data. That should never happen. Shouldn’t be WiFi. We have that now documented in real time. That is going on right there where everyone is voting. I just wanted to get that into the record.”

So, David, if it should not be happening that the poll pad is hooked up to WiFi and it IS sending and receiving data, where is your proof there is no fraud taking place? Because being hooked up to WiFi, sending and receiving data is proof there is.

Your argument is weak. But, hey, try to win that argument. You do you, David.

Anyone who thinks there wasn't massive coordinated fraud in these recent elections is willfully deaf, dumb, and blind. And therefore their "opinion" is wholly irrelevent and is nothing more than a propaganda talking point. Even when proof is demonstrated live right in front of them they just live in denial.

Italygate, anyone?

[1 God]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Anyone who thinks there wasn't massive coordinated fraud in these recent elections is willfully deaf, dumb, and blind. And therefore their "opinion" is wholly irrelevent and is nothing more than a propaganda talking point. Even when proof is demonstrated live right in front of them they just live in denial.

Italygate, anyone?

I watched hours of fraud videos and testimonies under oath.

It was definitely a coup.

The swamp won. It was massive in scope.

At least the swamp and it's tributaries were defined for all to see via Trump.

Thank you, Mr. President for pulling the covers off for us to see it. DOJ..Big Tech...Congress...China...Dominion...Biden family...you name it,

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by 1 God

I watched hours of fraud videos and testimonies under oath.

It was definitely a coup.

The swamp won. It was massive in scope.

At least the swamp and it's tributaries were defined for all to see via Trump.

Thank you, Mr. President for pulling the covers off for us to see it. DOJ..Big Tech...Congress...China...Dominion...Biden family...you name it,

Nobody has "won" anything yet. The chess pieces are being put in place for the next phase of the long game.