Dom said,
Quote:
|
Please please explain how can we believe the Bible is reliable if it was so Hellenized to hide the original name "sacred name" of our savior? If they banged up the name of the savior, what else did they step on so much to mistranslate its message to us in the 21st century?
|
It was not trying to hide the name. The issue is we feel it is more accurate if it was transliterated from the Hebrew instead of from the Greek. Transliterating from the Greek takes us a step farther from the true name.
Having said that it is certainly not sinful to call the Lord "Jesus". Neither must one "know Hebrew" to walk with God. But if one's love for the Lord and truth leads them to seek more accurate knowledge of the Lord and his name good for them!
By the way, you have the same problem with the Bible as we do. You seem to think the Bible is more perfect if one used Iesous or Jesus. And yet....it is common knowledge the "s" at the end is merely there as a part of conforming it to the Greek language. It is added by men. Yet who cares? Is that the way we should approach the name of the Lord?
Bottom line. I understand the complexities of the issue. Thats why I do not spend my time railing on the name Jesus. Why would I? It is more of a translation issue than a doctrinal one. It is important to me but not salvational.
I am not "angry" when someone uses a version of the name in their own language. Nonetheless I am "happy" when I hear the Hebrew/Aramaic being used. My preference and the other persons.
Why should it always be attacked and belittled among "Apostolics" who pride themselves on having more truth than the other guy?