UPC Pastor Convicted of Slander in Pulpit! - Page 26

allstate1 · #**251** 07-13-2010, 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charnock

Since Eden, exposing nakedness has always been immodest (inappropriate) in God's eyes. In fact, it's downright shameful.

So if this was your wife what would your grounds for divorce be? Legally and Church?? I can see the judge as you tell him of the wicked ways of the woman in a bikini !! I am sure you will escape alimony payments with that one!!!!

jfrog · #**252** 07-13-2010, 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charnock

Niiiccceeee.

I suppose you condone that?

which part?

Cindy · #**253** 07-13-2010, 03:19 PM

The only reason this poor woman's actions were called into question. Even though she WAS NOT A MEMBER OF HIS CHURCH. Is because the PASTOR'S DAUGHTER WAS ROMANTICALLY INVOLVED WITH THE EX-HUSBAND. So for them to be able to marry according to scripture, was if the wife or husband committed adultery. Wearing a bikini is not adultery. Maybe some people should keep their own house in order, before they try to tear down someone else's.

jfrog · #**254** 07-13-2010, 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charnock

I think AFF needs to revisit the concept of modesty (appropriateness).

The baby has been thrown out with the bathwater.

lol.

MissBrattified · #**255** 07-13-2010, 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charnock

I think AFF needs to revisit the concept of modesty (appropriateness).

The baby has been thrown out with the bathwater.

Good grief, Charnock. I'm not endorsing immodesty. I'm just saying that your wife being immodest isn't reason enough to divorce her. Have you read the story of Hosea and Gomer lately?

Apparently you need to revisit the concept of longterm commitment and keeping your word.

Charnock · #**256** 07-13-2010, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RandyWayne

Well since we know nothing about the situation we can only guess but what if it was a case of "Hon, are you ready to head to the pool?", "Just go, I'll catch up in a few minutes", in which case her and "him" (his own wife may have been there the whole time as well -a "minor" detail left out) simply were the first to arrive.

Or, maybe same hanky panky WAS going on. She said there wasn't. Perhaps HE (the other husband) was the one pursuing her.

Totally possible.

It's amusing that a few uber-libs want to paint me an ultra-con.

allstate1 · #**257** 07-13-2010, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MissBrattified

Good grief, Charnock. I'm not endorsing immodesty. I'm just saying that your wife being immodest isn't reason enough to divorce her. Have you read the story of Hosea and Gomer lately?

Apparently you need to revisit the concept of longterm commitment and keeping your word.

jfrog · #**258** 07-13-2010, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baron1710

No!?

You disagree?

Charnock · #**259** 07-13-2010, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MissBrattified

Good grief, Charnock. I'm not endorsing immodesty. I'm just saying that your wife being immodest isn't reason enough to divorce her. Have you read the story of Hosea and Gomer lately?

Apparently you need to revisit the concept of longterm commitment and keeping your word.

Long term commitment goes bye-bye when adultery occurs.

A wife wanting to expose herself to , and spend naked time alone, with someone other than her husband qualifies.

Baron1710 · #**260** 07-13-2010, 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charnock

Your Christian love is such a beautiful thing. Those who justify public nakedness have sin issues.

Nowhere was any public nakedness mentioned.