Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 08-28-2009, 06:34 AM
Esther's Avatar
Esther Esther is offline
Administrator


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 12,362
Re: Stonekings Covering

Quote:
Originally Posted by MissBrattified View Post
I think the point is that since LS believes the covering refers to uncut or short hair (depending on the gender in question), wearing a cap would not be inconsistent with his own teachings, OR his interpretation of scripture. It makes the "hypocrisy" accusation null and void in this instance.

Unless someone teaches that men should remove their hats during prayer, and women should wear hats or veils during prayer, (which LS does not teach), then they should take no issue with women going without veils or men keeping their hats on.

Now, I think LS is way off on his hair teachings, generally speaking, but the comments about his Jewish hat are just silly, because it doesn't contradict a single thing the man believes or teaches.
__________________
Happy moments, PRAISE GOD.
Difficult moments, SEEK GOD.
Quiet moments, WORSHIP GOD.
Painful moments, TRUST GOD.
Every moment, THANK GOD.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-28-2009, 09:00 AM
Michael The Disciple's Avatar
Michael The Disciple Michael The Disciple is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 14,650
Re: Stonekings Covering

Quote:
Originally Posted by missourimary View Post
If you feel this is the unalterable truth and the only interpretation, by all means, go call the man and teach him the error of his way. Don't accuse him on a discussion board he isn't a part of.

What is the topic of discussion on this thread Missourimary?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-28-2009, 09:09 AM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Re: Stonekings Covering

I am NOT now nor have I ever been a Stoneking fan but he teaches that LONG hair is the covering NOT an articial covering.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-28-2009, 09:42 AM
ManOfWord's Avatar
ManOfWord ManOfWord is offline
Honorary Admin


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 6,287
Re: Stonekings Covering

To the Jewish men, the wearing of a Kippah or Yarmulke, as it is called, is a remembrance that there is always someone (God) over them. Yarmulke means "in awe of the King." I happily don one whenever I enter a Synagogue. It is a Jewish custom which I respectfully follow. Paul did the same.
__________________
"Those who go after the "Sauls" among us often slay the Davids among us." Gene Edwards
Executive Servant
http://www.newlife-church.org
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-28-2009, 09:44 AM
MissBrattified's Avatar
MissBrattified MissBrattified is offline
Administrator


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,829
Re: Stonekings Covering

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple View Post
1 Cor. 11:4

This is Pauls teaching given by inspiration of the Spirit. Culture has nothing to do with it. It is an ordinance of the Church. Stoneking is in violation tho he does not believe it. He is making the commands of Christ of none affect by his tradition.
Well, Michael, that is your opinion, based on the idea that it is a physical covering rather than hair. I suppose you believe the same about me, since I believe my long hair is a covering, RATHER than a hat or veil.

No matter, the point is that the statements about LS being a hypocrite for wearing a hat during prayer don't hold up. One is a hypocrite when one says one thing and does another. LS says one thing--and does it.
__________________
"God, send me anywhere, only go with me. Lay any burden on me, only sustain me. And sever any tie in my heart except the tie that binds my heart to Yours."
--David Livingstone


"To see no being, not God’s or any, but you also go thither,
To see no possession but you may possess it—enjoying all without labor or purchase—
abstracting the feast, yet not abstracting one particle of it;…."

--Walt Whitman, Leaves of Grass, Song of the Open Road
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-28-2009, 10:33 PM
izzorac79 izzorac79 is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 13
Re: Stonekings Covering

Quote:
Originally Posted by ManOfWord View Post
To the Jewish men, the wearing of a Kippah or Yarmulke, as it is called, is a remembrance that there is always someone (God) over them. Yarmulke means "in awe of the King." I happily don one whenever I enter a Synagogue. It is a Jewish custom which I respectfully follow. Paul did the same.

Paul follow the law because there was temple still standing. When the temple was destroyed in 70ad it was destroyed with all the record of every single hebrew with the exception of Jesus (the bible Mathew and Luke). We don't follow the traditions of man, but of God. we don't become like them, they have to become like Christ. The jew of today has no way of tracking down his or her lenieage. We as Christians don't were Kippah because we don't mourn after a temple because we are the temple of the Holy Ghost. They need that temple to have access to the precense of God. Christians don't need that physical temple. A jew believes according to the Talmud that Christ is dead in his own bown movements because he was born of roman soldier that raped mary, and you are going to wear a Kippah. why stop there, wear a hindu monk attire when you visit those temples.

The only reason Paul follow the law is because the temple was still there. during that time 2 kingdoms were running the physical and the spiritual kingdom Gal 4 the physical kingdom (the law system, the physical temple) had to be removed just like ishmael, that way the spiritual kingdom can go forward (issac).
__________________
Many men will do men things, but few men will do God things
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-28-2009, 10:50 PM
pelathais's Avatar
pelathais pelathais is offline
Accepts all friends requests


 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,609
Re: Stonekings Covering

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple View Post
1 Cor. 11:4

This is Pauls teaching given by inspiration of the Spirit. Culture has nothing to do with it. It is an ordinance of the Church. Stoneking is in violation tho he does not believe it. He is making the commands of Christ of none affect by his tradition.
I really don't think it's "his" (Lee S.) tradition so much as him being obedient to the rules and regulations that govern the area in proximity to the Western Wall.

Tell you what Michael, next time you're over there just push past all of the Jewish caretakers pleading with you to stop, and just strut right up to the Western Wall, raise your hands and speak in tongues.

Let me know ahead of time when you'll be there because this sounds like a great YouTube documentary in the making. Then before they can arrest you, run down to the entrance to the Temple Mount itself, charge up the stairs and... I dunno, do whatever you feel led to do.

Pray in tongues, put your foot in the impression of the Prophet's "footprint" on the Rock at Moriah to compare shoe sizes. Just kind of roll with it and I'll keep the camera rolling.

When you get out of the hospital you will be deported and banned from the Holy Land for life. But I'll have a great YouTube video.

On the other hand, you could just put on the little hat like everybody else.

Last edited by pelathais; 08-28-2009 at 10:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-28-2009, 11:36 PM
Hoovie's Avatar
Hoovie Hoovie is offline
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
Re: Stonekings Covering

Quote:
Originally Posted by ManOfWord View Post
To the Jewish men, the wearing of a Kippah or Yarmulke, as it is called, is a remembrance that there is always someone (God) over them. Yarmulke means "in awe of the King." I happily don one whenever I enter a Synagogue. It is a Jewish custom which I respectfully follow. Paul did the same.
What Paul did in Temple via vows and ritual was temporary. Regarding covering heads in prayer though he was clear with the Corinthians.

I would expect the Jews today to cover - because Christ is not revealed or exposed in their hearts and minds. For Christian men though, Christ is revealed and if he covers to pray it is dishonorable.

Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God. 4Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head. 5And every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head—it is just as though her head were shaved. 6If a woman does not cover her head, she should have her hair cut off; and if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut or shaved off, she should cover her head. 7[B]A man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God;
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005

I am a firm believer in the Old Paths

Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945

"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 08-29-2009, 05:53 AM
Baron1710's Avatar
Baron1710 Baron1710 is offline
Cross-examine it!


 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Orcutt, CA.
Posts: 6,736
Re: Stonekings Covering

Quote:
Originally Posted by pelathais View Post
I really don't think it's "his" (Lee S.) tradition so much as him being obedient to the rules and regulations that govern the area in proximity to the Western Wall.

Tell you what Michael, next time you're over there just push past all of the Jewish caretakers pleading with you to stop, and just strut right up to the Western Wall, raise your hands and speak in tongues.

Let me know ahead of time when you'll be there because this sounds like a great YouTube documentary in the making. Then before they can arrest you, run down to the entrance to the Temple Mount itself, charge up the stairs and... I dunno, do whatever you feel led to do.

Pray in tongues, put your foot in the impression of the Prophet's "footprint" on the Rock at Moriah to compare shoe sizes. Just kind of roll with it and I'll keep the camera rolling.

When you get out of the hospital you will be deported and banned from the Holy Land for life. But I'll have a great YouTube video.

On the other hand, you could just put on the little hat like everybody else.
Right on target again. When I was at the wall, they wouldn't even let you come in to the area of the wall unless your head was covered. I also took my shoes off to walk through the Dome of the Stone. I am no defender of the King of Stones but jumping him for obeying the customs at the wall is weak.
__________________
"Beware lest you lose the substance by grasping at the shadow." ~Aesop
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 08-29-2009, 07:01 AM
Justin's Avatar
Justin Justin is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,395
Re: Stonekings Covering

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoovie View Post
What Paul did in Temple via vows and ritual was temporary. Regarding covering heads in prayer though he was clear with the Corinthians.

I would expect the Jews today to cover - because Christ is not revealed or exposed in their hearts and minds. For Christian men though, Christ is revealed and if he covers to pray it is dishonorable.

Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God. 4Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head. 5And every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head—it is just as though her head were shaved. 6If a woman does not cover her head, she should have her hair cut off; and if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut or shaved off, she should cover her head. 7[B]A man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God;
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
If the Long Hair is a covering Praxeas Fellowship Hall 87 09-13-2012 06:31 PM
Covering:Veil or Hair: Part II? Answers Inside 1Corinth2v4 Fellowship Hall 75 01-22-2009 09:34 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.