Great stuff Bro Blume. So are we to interpret that there was man before adam ? Otherwise who populated the "kingdoms" that fell ?
Since the bible says the first man was Adam, I would say it was not man before Adam, but perhaps the angels who fell with Lucifer?
__________________ ...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.
"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Since the bible says the first man was Adam, I would say it was not man before Adam, but perhaps the angels who fell with Lucifer?
that would explain the marred creation, and why people say there are two accounts of creation
__________________
All that is gold does not glitter, Not all those who wander are lost; The old that is strong does not wither, Deep roots are not reached by the frost. ~Tolkien
refresh my memory on all the different ones there are please
__________________
All that is gold does not glitter, Not all those who wander are lost; The old that is strong does not wither, Deep roots are not reached by the frost. ~Tolkien
that would explain the marred creation, and why people say there are two accounts of creation
Right. And it does not conflict with the bible by adding odd ideas about another human race. I have a study of this on my website and I get into part 2 in speaking of how this is a type of how we are saved today.
"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
BTW, FWIW, Martin Luther wasn't very happy with James being in the Bible, and another one or two, IIRC. FWIW.
And then there is the canon of books listed in the Bible itself. The list given by God. All those other canons are a teaching/doctrine/tradition of man.
__________________
Hebrews 13:23 Know ye that our brother Timothy is set at liberty
Linear Mode
