Pastor openly rebukes Evangelist from the pulpit - Page 3

houston · #21 05-16-2012, 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deacon blues

These sign seekers wear me out. I'm glad the pastor spoke the truth. The reaction from the audience (notice it was full of women) was an indicator to me what spirit they were of. I've seen more damage from these self appointed modern day prophets that it makes me ill to hear them speak or see them on tv. It's spiritualism that disguises itself as an angel of light. But God doesnt get the glory.

So I can go into your tent and rebuke you? Ha.

acerrak · #22 05-16-2012, 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RevDWW

If she was a prophetess why could she not know that he was there to cause issues?

she did, you can tell they had issues a previous day. It was like she was praying over him for him to not cause a seen. again this is really just a arogant pridefull rebuke

Steve Epley · #23 05-16-2012, 10:15 AM

Both of them are lost as two boys kissing.

acerrak · #24 05-16-2012, 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Both of them are lost as two boys kissing.

glad God didnt make you judge!! but maybe next time you sin a picture of you kissing another man may come to your mine..

AreYouReady? · #25 05-16-2012, 10:27 AM

Confusion.

Don't make any assumptions.

Jay · #26 05-16-2012, 10:53 AM

I seemed to me that both were operating from a position of flesh. He was as artificial seeming in his rebuke of her as she was of him. Neither one seemed to actually have any true spiritual power or authority. Just more stupidity from those who wish to be broadcast on tv. (And some people wonder why we did not want any part of it?)

Dagwood, I believe in permitting cds to be made, but I am against making video of church services, and it seems that every year my position against movies, tv, and video solidifies that much further.

acerrak · #27 05-16-2012, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jay

I seemed to me that both were operating from a position of flesh. He was as artificial seeming in his rebuke of her as she was of him. Neither one seemed to actually have any true spiritual power or authority. Just more stupidity from those who wish to be broadcast on tv. (And some people wonder why we did not want any part of it?)

Dagwood, I believe in permitting cds to be made, but I am against making video of church services, and it seems that every year my position against movies, tv, and video solidifies that much further.

last i checked every preach i have seen had flesh attached to them. Its a great thing we can judge a persons charcter off their faults or even from just a scene, with out ever considering the bigger picture.

Maybe we should look at peter the same way since he denied christ 3 times and also showed favortism to the jews over the gentiles. yea he was just operating in the flesh............... no spirituality .............

Dagwood · #28 05-16-2012, 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jay

I seemed to me that both were operating from a position of flesh. He was as artificial seeming in his rebuke of her as she was of him. Neither one seemed to actually have any true spiritual power or authority. Just more stupidity from those who wish to be broadcast on tv. (And some people wonder why we did not want any part of it?)

Dagwood, I believe in permitting cds to be made, but I am against making video of church services, and it seems that every year my position against movies, tv, and video solidifies that much further.

At the moment, church is livestreaming services via audio only with podcasts avail on iTunes. However, previously one could watch video. I'm not sure if video will return, but knowing I can listen in is just as effective for me as being there in person or watching online.

If we do return to video, I won't oppose it. I just hope nothing of this sort (posted above) ever happens. I'm confident it won't as my pastor has a very unique quality about him in his sensitivity to the Spirit.

RandyWayne · #29 05-16-2012, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jay

I seemed to me that both were operating from a position of flesh. He was as artificial seeming in his rebuke of her as she was of him. Neither one seemed to actually have any true spiritual power or authority. Just more stupidity from those who wish to be broadcast on tv. (And some people wonder why we did not want any part of it?)

Dagwood, I believe in permitting cds to be made, but I am against making video of church services, and it seems that every year my position against movies, tv, and video solidifies that much further.

Absolutely, 100% agree. They are/were both self serving maroons (as Bugs Bunny would say) who are in the business of religion. In fact, I can't help but think of BroR's friend who attends other services for the sole purpose of "putting them in their place!" when asked to testify.

I am FOR using television in any of its current forms to broadcast services and don't believe some sort of "guilty by association" reason should keep anyone from using any means possible to spread the gospel. However, having said that, TV shows are much LESS effective now then they were, say 10 - 20 years ago simply because the viewing options have skyrocketed for most people since then. I would estimate that a late night, or early Sunday morning show is about as effective as a telemarketing campaign -and we all know how much a robo call effects our opinion on anything.

Question.... Why shouldn't services be video taped? What is the difference between audio and video? I know I can't imagine EVER watching a pre-recorded service versus having it playing in the background but some do benefit (don't know why but they do) from seeing as well as hearing.

Jay · #30 05-16-2012, 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by acerrak

Last I checked every preacher I have seen had flesh attached to them. Its a great thing we can judge a persons character off their faults or even from just a scene, with out ever considering the bigger picture.

Maybe we should look at peter the same way since he denied Christ 3 times and also showed favoritism to the Jews over the gentiles. yea he was just operating in the flesh............... no spirituality .............

Peter was filled with the Holy Ghost, and while he made some mistakes (common with humanity) he would not have allowed himself to be cornered into such a ridiculous display. When Paul took issue with Peter, they hashed it out behind closed doors (why else would Paul later be telling the church that he took Peter on). Neither one of these two handled the situation with anything more than a display of the works of the flesh, and their followers did exactly the same.

I am so thankful that I do not have a television to pollute my mind with this filth. I know it occurs, and I do not need to see it for myself.