Netanyahu: I will name a golan town after trump

[Esaias]

In one instance, the consumer genetics company 23andMe told one twin she was 13 percent “Broadly European.” The other twin’s test, meanwhile, showed she had just 3 percent “Broadly European” ancestry, and had more DNA matched to other, more specific regions in Europe. What’s more, when the twins had their DNA tested by five companies, each one gave them different results.

https://www.vox.com/science-and-heal...ence-explainer

[Evang.Benincasa]

The Israelites/Judeans lineages weren’t about DNA.
How do you check DNA for a Levite priest who had married a prostitute and sired children? Leviticus 21:7. DNA wouldn’t of picked up if a Levite married a daughter of Barzillai, a Gileadite. After 2,000 + years and being dispearsed among the nation of the world the with no viable lineages, Ezra and Nehemiah would of thrown what WE call Jews off the building program. Most certainly there is no one qualified to be high priest alive today. Thank God we have the Gospel and our King and High Priest Jesus Christ.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

The Israelites/Judeans lineages weren’t about DNA.
How do you check DNA for a Levite priest who had married a prostitute and sired children? Leviticus 21:7. DNA wouldn’t of picked up if a Levite married a daughter of Barzillai, a Gileadite. After 2,000 + years and being dispearsed among the nation of the world the with no viable lineages, Ezra and Nehemiah would of thrown what WE call Jews off the building program. Most certainly there is no one qualified to be high priest alive today. Thank God we have the Gospel and our King and High Priest Jesus Christ.

Amen!!

I thank God that He would never throw Israel or its people under the bus today. God isn't anti-semitic. That we can be thankful for as well.

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Amen!!

I thank God that He would never throw Israel or its people under the bus today. God isn't anti-semitic. That we can be thankful for as well.

Judeo-Christianity is a different religion than what the Bible gives us, apparently.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Judeo-Christianity is a different religion than what the Bible gives us, apparently.

Well, make sure you don't sing - He brought me out of the miry clay.

He doesn't stop loving and reaching for people in any group just because they don't have the truth right. I am glad, as a young Catholic, that He lead me to Him.

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Well, make sure you don't sing - He brought me out of the miry clay.

He doesn't stop loving and reaching for people in any group just because they don't have the truth right. I am glad, as a young Catholic, that He lead me to Him.

Seriously? Do you even read what you post?

You said "I thank God that He would never throw Israel or its people under the bus today. God isn't anti-semitic."

God DID INDEED "throw Israel under the bus", several times. That wouldn't make Him "antisemitic" at all. By the way, is God anticanaanitic? Aren't Arabs and Palestinians supposed to be Semitic, too?

You also distinguished between Israel "or its people". You seem to think the political entity called "The State Of Israel" is the Israel spoken of in the Bible? Israel, in the Bible, IS THE PEOPLE.

But anyway, God Himself in His Word says whoever denies Jesus is the Christ is ANTICHRIST.

How is it that Christians can support and side with and defend ANTICHRIST??? Meanwhile many of you are all busy thinking Nicolai Carpathia or whatever with his VeriChip giveaway is what the Bible is warning about, while you SERVE ANTICHRIST THINKING YOU ARE SERVING GOD!!!!!

Didn't those old timey preachers tell you that Antichrist would be a DECEIVER? Not show up with horns and pitchfork drooling black venom like some WitchKing of Angmar.

Good grief the deception runs thick.

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by Esaias

But anyway, God Himself in His Word says whoever denies Jesus is the Christ is ANTICHRIST.

[Ehud]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Didn't those old timey preachers tell you that Antichrist would be a DECEIVER? Not show up with horns and pitchfork drooling black venom...

I don’t ever recall being taught this in my local congregation. It wasn’t until I began watching the Seventh Day Adventists that this point was really driven home.

[TK Burk]

Biblically, to be considered “Jewish,” a person would either be born of Jewish parents, born of a Jewish mother or be a gentile converted according to Old Testament Law. This latter group is known as a “proselyte.” Though proselytes converted to Judaism, they did not gain entry into a Jewish tribe, since their conversion did not add them to the already ongoing history of Jewish lineage. The only way to become part of this genealogy was to marry into it. Examples of such conversion are a Canaanite named Rahab (Rachab), and a Moabitess named Ruth. Both of these former gentiles are mentioned in Jesus’ Jewish genealogy (see Matthew 1:5). When these gentile women married their Jewish husbands, they became believers in the one true God, and they agreed to keep the Old Testament commandments (see Joshua 2:9-11; Ruth 1:16). As a result, they became members of their husband’s Jewish tribe. This is why we find both Rahab and Ruth in the lineage of Judah, and why they are both listed in the ancestry leading back to Abraham and Adam. Such inclusion into a Jewish tribe was never available for gentiles who remained in idolatry.

The Law requires that Priests provide a written lineage to prove they derived from a pure Hebrew bloodline (see Exodus 6:14-25; Numbers 3:1-5, Numbers 3:17-39, Numbers 26:57-61; Nehemiah 7:4-73; Nehemiah 12:1-26; Matthew 1:1-16; Luke 3:23-38). This evidence had to be a written account proving an untainted bloodline tracing back to the time of Abraham and Adam. DNA (Deoxyribonucleic acid) can't—and never will—do this since it cannot prove there was never any gentile blood in their descents. The Bible disqualified a priest and his offspring if there was ever any intermingling with gentiles (see Nehemiah 7:5, Nehemiah 7:63-64; Ezra 2:61-62, Ezra 10:11-19). In addition to this, if you were a priest during the time of Herod’s Temple, you had to prove, not only Levite lineage, but also, more specifically, a lineage from the Levite tribe of Zadok (see Ezekiel 43:19, Ezekiel 44:15-17, Ezekiel 48:11-12). The Jewish lineage records were burned and destroyed during the 70 AD destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple. Thus, no such records remain that can prove an untainted bloodline dating back to the time of Adam.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

Biblically, to be considered “Jewish,” a person would either be born of Jewish parents, born of a Jewish mother or be a gentile converted according to Old Testament Law. This latter group is known as a “proselyte.” Though proselytes converted to Judaism, they did not gain entry into a Jewish tribe, since their conversion did not add them to the already ongoing history of Jewish lineage. The only way to become part of this genealogy was to marry into it. Examples of such conversion are a Canaanite named Rahab (Rachab), and a Moabitess named Ruth. Both of these former gentiles are mentioned in Jesus’ Jewish genealogy (see Matthew 1:5). When these gentile women married their Jewish husbands, they became believers in the one true God, and they agreed to keep the Old Testament commandments (see Joshua 2:9-11; Ruth 1:16). As a result, they became members of their husband’s Jewish tribe. This is why we find both Rahab and Ruth in the lineage of Judah, and why they are both listed in the ancestry leading back to Abraham and Adam. Such inclusion into a Jewish tribe was never available for gentiles who remained in idolatry.

The Law requires that Priests provide a written lineage to prove they derived from a pure Hebrew bloodline (see Exodus 6:14-25; Numbers 3:1-5, Numbers 3:17-39, Numbers 26:57-61; Nehemiah 7:4-73; Nehemiah 12:1-26; Matthew 1:1-16; Luke 3:23-38). This evidence had to be a written account proving an untainted bloodline tracing back to the time of Abraham and Adam. DNA (Deoxyribonucleic acid) can't—and never will—do this since it cannot prove there was never any gentile blood in their descents. The Bible disqualified a priest and his offspring if there was ever any intermingling with gentiles (see Nehemiah 7:5, Nehemiah 7:63-64; Ezra 2:61-62, Ezra 10:11-19). In addition to this, if you were a priest during the time of Herod’s Temple, you had to prove, not only Levite lineage, but also, more specifically, a lineage from the Levite tribe of Zadok (see Ezekiel 43:19, Ezekiel 44:15-17, Ezekiel 48:11-12). The Jewish lineage records were burned and destroyed during the 70 AD destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple. Thus, no such records remain that can prove an untainted bloodline dating back to the time of Adam.

Amen, it was never about DNA, but genealogy.
The super interesting thing about all of this is how utterly brainwashed people are concerning this subject. Circumcision was the Old Covenant mark which joined you with God and the nation. Paul was dead set against any Roman non Judean joining into the genealogical record of Physical Israel. But Zionist Christians here in the United States can’t see how the Apostle Paul viewed the whole circumcision and Judean identity thing among the Gentiles. The Judeans wanted just to convert Gentiles into physical Judeans after they were baptized in Jesus name. Which the Apostle was vehemently opposed to.

Being called anti Semitic over this issue just shows how confused the other side can be. Dispensationalism is to blame. A Jewish formulated teaching.