Trump 2nd Impeachment- 2 opposing views

[1 God]

Originally Posted by aegsm76

Says a totally non-biased observer...

What do you call the Russia Hoax...

What do you call the numerous congressmen and numerous other BHO staff who stated in public and on MSM that they had proof, but when they testified to Congress stated (under oath) that they had no evidence.
Were those lies an attack?

C'mon man...

These folks you speak of caused the loss of the House. Their false claims made the Repubs keep Trump at an arms length and get little done. It worked like a charm. Thank God for Devin Nunes.

[n david]

I liked Pompeo but I'm not sure I want a former spook as POTUS.

I'm watching Ron DeSantis. He's got some fight in him, like Trump did, though without the Twitter TS.

I don't want the typical politician, like Ted Cruz or Nikki Haley. I like Cruz but he's become the typical DC politician. I've never been a Haley fan.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by 1 God

Mike Pompeo 2024!

Trump is still too polarizing to be ready for another candidate. We will have to wait a little longer. He has created an account at Telegram announcing that he formed the Office of the former President. And his team have two Pro-Trump think tanks in the works.

He has already endorsed Keli Ward in Arizona who won her reelection as Chairwoman of the Arizona Republican Party.

He has also endorsed Sarah Huckabee as she announced her run for Governor of Arkansas.

Trump will be formidable in the future for his own plans and for those they choose to stay the course for the MAGA movement.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by n david

I like Cruz but he's become the typical DC politician.

No he isn’t. Sigh...

[Pressing-On]

After Senators are sworn in as jurors this afternoon, they will have a vote to dismiss. We will see which Republicans don’t understand the Constitution.

How offensive to have a Democrat lead the trial who will also cast a vote. And why is John Roberts not presiding? Because Trump isn’t the President.

The Senate has no Constitutional right to try a Civilian. God help us all.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

No he isn’t. Sigh...

Yes, he is. I really like Cruz but if you step back and look without any filters or bias, you'd see that, too.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

After Senators are sworn in as jurors this afternoon, they will have a vote to dismiss. We will see which Republicans don’t understand the Constitution.

How offensive to have a Democrat lead the trial who will also cast a vote. And why is John Roberts not presiding? Because Trump isn’t the President.

The Senate has no Constitutional right to try a Civilian. God help us all.

Leaky Leahy shouldn't be allowed to cast a vote if he's presiding over the trial. Period. You cannot be an "unbiased" Judge while at the same time serve as a Juror who will determine guilt or innocence. I wish the GOP had a spine and threatened to walk if this continues.

Glad Rand Paul is pushing the point of order to force a vote and get people on the record for/against the constitutionality of the process.

Trump is gone. The impeachment trial is to garner a verdict, whether to acquit or find guilty. If he's found guilty, they can't remove him from office because he's already out of the office.

And if their end game is to try to pass a bill to ban Trump from running in 2024, I don't see how it will hold up in court.

[Pressing-On]

Charlie Kirk
@charliekirk11
This is the BEST takedown of Democrats’ unconstitutional impeachment sham I’ve seen.

EVERY American should see this speech from
@RandPaul
.

Watch what your elected officials are busy debating while millions of Americans are suffering

RT!

https://youtu.be/KTiGZeyZw3s

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by n david

Leaky Leahy shouldn't be allowed to cast a vote if he's presiding over the trial. Period. You cannot be an "unbiased" Judge while at the same time serve as a Juror who will determine guilt or innocence. I wish the GOP had a spine and threatened to walk if this continues.

Glad Rand Paul is pushing the point of order to force a vote and get people on the record for/against the constitutionality of the process.

Trump is gone. The impeachment trial is to garner a verdict, whether to acquit or find guilty. If he's found guilty, they can't remove him from office because he's already out of the office.

And if their end game is to try to pass a bill to ban Trump from running in 2024, I don't see how it will hold up in court.

Agreed!

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by n david

Yes, he is. I really like Cruz but if you step back and look without any filters or bias, you'd see that, too.

I dare say that I follow him more closely than you do. Take your suggestion on the bias and blinders, David. Words matter. You can’t use that excuse to accuse people who don’t agree with you.

He is the one that wanted to help settle the country down by having an emergency 10-day audit that he got the other Republicans to agree to.

That was turned into a lie that he wanted to overturn the election.