|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|
10-19-2015, 12:37 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
|
|
|
Re: Some standing here
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume
That's why they asked about the sign of His coming, because they heard him talk about destruction of the temple stone by stone, and the last time he spoke of His coming was in Matt 21 where he said he'd come and destroy those wicked husbandmen called pharisees and religious leaders, and give the kingdom to someone else. They knew temple destruction was the coming from Matthew 21:40, not the second coming. No resurrection of the second coming was associated with the coming of destruction written in Matthew. |
Read my words.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.
"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
|
10-19-2015, 12:37 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
|
|
|
Re: Some standing here
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean
I thought you were trying to say this passage was about the 2nd coming. Thanks for clarifying that you do not believe that.
|
I have always maintained that the coming of the Lord in AD70 was NOT the second coming. You never knew that in all the times I said it to you? That is the whole point of partial preterism. The second coming is future.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.
"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
|
10-19-2015, 12:38 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 23,543
|
|
|
Re: Some standing here
Actually, when we recieved the Holy Ghost, Jesus "came" to us.
|
10-19-2015, 12:39 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
|
|
|
Re: Some standing here
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean
Actually, when we recieved the Holy Ghost, Jesus "came" to us.
|
Yes, that is a coming as well. But that's not the second coming, is it? That is exactly what I have been trying to tell you for months now.  AD70 was A COMING, but not the 2nd coming.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.
"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
|
10-19-2015, 12:39 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 23,543
|
|
|
Re: Some standing here
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume
I have always maintained that the coming of the Lord in AD70 was NOT the second coming. You never knew that in all the times I said it to you? That is the whole point of partial preterism. The second coming is future.
|
No!!!!!!!!
I thought all along, you guys believed the 2nd coming was 70ad!!!!!
|
10-19-2015, 12:40 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
|
|
|
Re: Some standing here
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean
No!!!!!!!!
I thought all along, you guys believed the 2nd coming was 70ad!!!!!
|
Full preterists do, BUT NOT PARTIAL preterists. I am partial preterist.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.
"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
|
10-19-2015, 12:42 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
|
|
|
Re: Some standing here
Partial preterism:
Matthew 24 is NOT the second coming. It's AD70 coming of destruction.
1 Thess 4 and 1 Cor 15 ARE the second coming. They are NOT AD70 coming of destruction.
Matthew 24 is not about 1 Thess 4 or 1 Cor 15.
Rev 1:7 is also NOT the second coming, but AD70 coming in destruction.
But I fully believe in the future second coming.
I actually told you that many times, Sean. I cannot understand why you never noticed that. Most everyone here knows partial preterists believe in the future second coming of Jesus.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.
"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Last edited by mfblume; 10-19-2015 at 12:49 PM.
|
10-19-2015, 12:52 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 23,543
|
|
|
Re: Some standing here
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume
Partial preterism:
Matthew 24 is NOT the second coming. It's AD70 coming of destruction.
Oh, I knew that...30 plus year difference between partial and full, right?.
1 Thess 4 and 1 Cor 15 ARE the second coming. They are NOT AD70 coming of destruction.
Okay, thanks for clarifying.
Matthew 24 is not about 1 Thess 4 or 1 Cor 15. |
Okay, you are just proposing multiple comings. I also believe in that.
Jesus came to me personally in 1978.(I sure was not going to him in those days...LOL)
|
10-19-2015, 01:00 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
|
|
|
Re: Some standing here
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean
Okay, you are just proposing multiple comings. I also believe in that.
Jesus came to me personally in 1978.(I sure was not going to him in those days...LOL)
|
Amen. That is all I have been trying to say ever since I spoke to you. I'm glad you finally told me you missed my point.
There is a coming in Matthew 24, but I am saying that is not the second coming. The second coming is in 1 Cor 15, John 5, and 1 Thess 4, and other places.
The second coming is a SPECIAL COMING distinct from all the others. It is THE GREAT coming. That never happened in AD70.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.
"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
|
10-19-2015, 01:08 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 23,543
|
|
|
Re: Some standing here
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume
Amen. That is all I have been trying to say ever since I spoke to you. I'm glad you finally told me you missed my point.
There is a coming in Matthew 24, but I am saying that is not the second coming. The second coming is in 1 Cor 15, John 5, and 1 Thess 4, and other places.
The second coming is a SPECIAL COMING distinct from all the others. It is THE GREAT coming. That never happened in AD70. |
So, you do not believe the 2nd coming happened in 70ad?
Then if not, when did it happen, according to you or partial preterism?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:29 PM.
| |
Linear Mode
