The Eulogy Begins - Page 36

Ron · #**351** 10-01-2007, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redeemedcynic84

the defense is the absurdity and hypocrisy of the doctrine against television....

So you can't defend it?

mfblume · #**352** 10-01-2007, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron

So you can't defend it?

Hey! The way in which you would defend internet would be exactly the same defense for TV. Think about it.

Ron · #**353** 10-01-2007, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mfblume

Hey! The way in which you would defend internet would be exactly the same defense for TV. Think about it.

Your argument on internet would have some merit, but the Res 4 deals with TV
not internet.

#**354** 10-01-2007, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron

So you can't defend it?

when you give me a reason for your hypocritical doctrine, I'll give you a real defense of my non-hypocritical one...

Ron · #**355** 10-01-2007, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redeemedcynic84

when you give me a reason for your hypocritical doctrine, I'll give you a real defense of my non-hypocritical one...

What is "MY" hypocritical doctrine??

Explain?

#**356** 10-01-2007, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron

What is "MY" hypocritical doctrine??

Explain?

anti-tv, pro-internet = hypocritical

explain how tv is worse than the internet and how it is impossible to police your tv viewing and I'll come up with a legit argument that we should be able to advertise/broadcast on tv... I might even come up with one for watching it...

Ferd · #**357** 10-01-2007, 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redeemedcynic84

when you give me a reason for your hypocritical doctrine, I'll give you a real defense of my non-hypocritical one...

I hate to butt in here. but honestly Ron isnt on of the ones, such a charge can be leveled at.

#**358** 10-01-2007, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ferd

I hate to butt in here. but honestly Ron isnt on of the ones, such a charge can be leveled at.

it was a "royal" you, not a specific "you", sorry if that was misunderstood... (although I did assume he was in support of the anti-tv thing)

Ferd · #**359** 10-01-2007, 02:02 PM

No prob. Ron is one of the good guys. but he has a point. I was for the resolution 100% but even I get that when we are talking about TV, the default argument is to yell INTERNET really loud.

that was all Ron was pointing out.

#**360** 10-01-2007, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ferd

No prob. Ron is one of the good guys. but he has a point. I was for the resolution 100% but even I get that when we are talking about TV, the default argument is to yell INTERNET really loud.

that was all Ron was pointing out.

but the simple fact that there is inherent hypocrisy in allowing internet but not tv (or even radio but not tv) is in fact an argument for television (that or an argument that they should preach against all of the above)

yelling "INTERNET" loudly is an argument for resolution 4...