Charlie Kirk wasn't shot with a .30-06?

[Evang.Benincasa]

It isn't Anti-Semitic to point out the facts of an insane religious cult.

https://youtu.be/9PYe34P4WWc?si=B_a6ou43W6ftOVcG

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

If alive, why? Why stage an event with an individual who had no actual power. When Kirk was shot, I mentioned the event to a few people. Who quickly commented that they had no idea who he was. Every event in history has a paper trail. What I mean is that there is a pretty obvious reason why something was done. Charlie Kirk was really a nobody. I myself didn’t give the guy much thought. But still there would be a skinny answer to this once we figure out a motive. Why fake a death? With the story of the Arkansas pastor, Elvis undercover as a preacher. The issue is that Elvis turned evidence against the Vegas mob. Therefore he needed to fake his death for the protection of his family, and himself. With Kirk, we would be able to put together a motive, and a reason to fake his death. One thing I would like to add for Adino, Candace Owens, while critical of Zionist Israel she isn’t anti-Semetic. She is stating the obvious objection to a system in the Middle East. Yet, does not believe that all Jews are evil, or need to be destroyed. What we have seen is the term antisemitic being overused to the point it has lost its meaning. I would gather Adino you might be around my age, and therefore grew up in a world which saw any critique of Israel as antisemitic? The modern state of Israel isn’t the same Israel that is found in the Bible. It was made out of whole cloth, and has zero bearing on Soteriology or Eschatology. Jerusalem today has as much to do with the Bible as Salt Lake City.

The pendulum needed to swing back a bit. When they people need a leader, we shall supply them one, or something like that. In this case, a martyr. MLK, JFK, George Floyd, etc. It's all scripted. Did you know there was a movie that came out years ago that basically includes the main points of the Kirk "assassination"? There are too many coinkidinks. Look at Kirk and his wife's background and their connections to Central Casting and Spook, Inc.

In any event, it's working, recruitment numbers for the military are up, the faux-right is back in business, and war is gonna be back on the table. I predict they are gonna try and put Newsome in as president to "bring back some good old fashioned American sanity" (unbelievable, I know, but we're in Clown World) so we can complete the Project For A New American Century.

Also, Project 2025 is moving ahead as well, so there's that.

[Ronnie G]

You don’t have to be a Zionist to realize something is really, REALLY sociopathically - wrong with Candace. I used to be a fan of hers, and was lightly rooting for her in the Macron saga, but she clearly hates Jews wholesale, and God-forbid her car throws a rod — Hymie’s gonna get the wrath!

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Ronnie G

You don’t have to be a Zionist to realize something is really, REALLY sociopathically - wrong with Candace. I used to be a fan of hers, and was lightly rooting for her in the Macron saga, but she clearly hates Jews wholesale, and God-forbid her car throws a rod — Hymie’s gonna get the wrath!

You mean Candace Owens sees 100% of Jews are evil?

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

You mean Candace Owens sees 100% of Jews are evil?

I think the issue for Candace Owens is she doesn’t only critique Zionist Israel. She critiques Talmudic Kabbalist Rabbinical Judaism. I know that’s a mouthful but that is what she is talking about. When she brings up Sigmund Freud, and Leo Frank, she brings up correlations to Talmudisim. Can we say this is antisemitic? No, because she isn’t broad brushing modern Jews across the board. Ronnie, hearing Candace speak on these subjects without knowing what she is actually talking about, can cause confusion. She isn’t saying all Modern Jewish men are exactly like Leo Frank. Or all Modern Jewish men are the same as Sigmund Freud? She isn’t, she is critiquing Zionism, and Talmudic Kabbalist Rabbinical Judaism. Which to those who have been raised in Zionistic Christianity she sounds like she is Popeye cursing out Brutus.

[Evang.Benincasa]

You know what should be pointed out? How Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, Nick Fuentes pro Catholic stance? But, some will tear up over the Zionist, and Rabbinical issues, but nothing concerning the pro Catholic stance? Priorities look a tad mixed up?

[Ronnie G]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

I think the issue for Candace Owens is she doesn’t only critique Zionist Israel. She critiques Talmudic Kabbalist Rabbinical Judaism. I know that’s a mouthful but that is what she is talking about. When she brings up Sigmund Freud, and Leo Frank, she brings up correlations to Talmudisim. Can we say this is antisemitic? No, because she isn’t broad brushing modern Jews across the board. Ronnie, hearing Candace speak on these subjects without knowing what she is actually talking about, can cause confusion. She isn’t saying all Modern Jewish men are exactly like Leo Frank. Or all Modern Jewish men are the same as Sigmund Freud? She isn’t, she is critiquing Zionism, and Talmudic Kabbalist Rabbinical Judaism. Which to those who have been raised in Zionistic Christianity she sounds like she is Popeye cursing out Brutus.

It’s not just a matter of not knowing what she’s talking about. It’s the “just asking questions” tactic that Tucker also uses. It’s clever, but overwrought.

She’s now on a tear about twelve “Israeli-based cell phones” being present on campus for the Charlie Kirk event in Utah. It sounds all “Ooooooh aand Ahhhhh” but is entirely unconnected from anything other than what she presents it.

And while she (of course) hasn’t directly accused Israel of killing Charlie Kirk—it seems the embossed outlook of her presentations is presenting that.

She’s about ten podcasts away from implying Erika Kirk was in on it, and her listener base is basically trained to make these extrapolations at the first raised eyebrow.

It’s possible to to be entirely anti-Semitic and still make valid statements that aren’t.

I can say this—she stated that Mamdani was an Israeli plant —with no qualification. But I think it was her only option, to avoided looking like she shared the same Jew-hating bed with him.

Her Catholicism has the winds of inquisition blowing through it as well.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Ronnie G

It’s not just a matter of not knowing what she’s talking about. It’s the “just asking questions” tactic that Tucker also uses. It’s clever, but overwrought.

She’s now on a tear about twelve “Israeli-based cell phones” being present on campus for the Charlie Kirk event in Utah. It sounds all “Ooooooh aand Ahhhhh” but is entirely unconnected from anything other than what she presents it.

And while she (of course) hasn’t directly accused Israel of killing Charlie Kirk—it seems the embossed outlook of her presentations is presenting that.

She’s about ten podcasts away from implying Erika Kirk was in on it, and her listener base is basically trained to make these extrapolations at the first raised eyebrow.

It’s possible to to be entirely anti-Semitic and still make valid statements that aren’t.

I can say this—she stated that Mamdani was an Israeli plant —with no qualification. But I think it was her only option, to avoided looking like she shared the same Jew-hating bed with him.

Her Catholicism has the winds of inquisition blowing through it as well.

You have an interesting view on this situation.

Mamdani is a Jew hater? I've have not found that to be factual. If it was, then can you explain how 33% of NYC Jews voted for him? How Satmar Jews had no problem with Mamdani? Rabbi Moshe Indig of the Satmar Hasidic community welcomed Mamdani. You do acknowledge the term Anti Semite means to eradicate all Semites? To be worthy of the term you would have to not just critique Jews, but you would have to despise Jews, to the point of wanting them erased from the earth. Candace already has given her view on this, by saying that she believes ZIONISTS rule the media. Not "JEWS"

I understand it is easy to mix the two together. Or should I say not be able to tell the two apart. A Zionist is not nessercessarly a Jew. The first Zionists were Christians. Not all Jews are Zionists. My lands, before Modern Israel was a thing, the Rabbis were totally against Modern Israel. They believed it to be unbiblical. Many Rabbinics still do believe it is unbiblical, and lead the world in Anti Zionism. Were you being facetious when you commented "Her Catholicism has the winds of inquisition blowing through it as well?" If you were being serious, could you please explain what exactly do you mean?

I'm not trying to white knight Candace Owens, or make it my business to defend her. I'm just pointing out there isn't any proof of her being a Jew hater. Also I'm not a Mamdani supporter, you brought that guy up. Yet, I find no solid evidence of him being a Jew hater.