Did Jesus Wear Pants?

[1ofthechosen]

Originally Posted by Esaias

So men shouldn't wear briefs because they are men's "panties", and women shouldnt wear panties because they are women's breeches? Is that what you're saying?

Breeches go down the leg... Panties are a different design then shorts and trousers. As a speedo is different from swimming trunks.

[Amanah]

Originally Posted by JoeBandy

Soooo in the case of women inventing underwear it was ok for humans to design it because her need evolved??? Pants on a woman became most popular during WW2 when all the men were fighting and the women working in the factories to provide weapon, ammunition etc... so this evolution of the females needing something more covering in the stooping, lifting and climbing they had to do is completely wrong?

Men are supposed to protect women, most women I know would rather be home caring for their families and raising their kids, not in the workforce or factories. My mother worked in a textile factory in Pennsylvania when she was a young girl and it was a hell hole.

When society breaks down everyone suffers, men, women, and children.

[1ofthechosen]

Originally Posted by JoeBandy

Here is the problem with your stance chosen1.. you keep going back to Exodus 28:42 so lets go there and keep with your logic. An ephod, a robe, broided coats ,mitre, girdle and bonnets would also be pertaining to a man. Then the colors blue, gold, purple and scarlet also pertaining to a man. I bet you a dollar to a donut hole you have no problem with a lady wearing a purple robe. Same writer same book same chapter....why choose one verse and ignore the others???

Ok I know where y'all are headed. Just pull out all stops and tear down al the fences. But like a smart man once said "before you tear down a fence, find out what its there for.." Next thing you know RuPaul is going to be singing in your choir too...

All these questions you ask Joe are a catch, don't got time for trolls..

[1ofthechosen]

Originally Posted by Amanah

Men are supposed to protect women, most women I know would rather be home caring for their families and raising their kids, not in the workforce or factories. My mother worked in a textile factory in Pennsylvania when she was a young girl and it was a hell hole.

When society breaks down everyone suffers, men, women, and children.

That's exactly right Sis, but when it does we shouldn't just adopt the mindset and custs of the tribulation. Because for many years men haven't al gone off to war and it stayed that way. Now for the world that makes sense, but why should the Church of the Living God just adopt a slave mentality, and call it normal. If no one sees where that's long its purposeless to even have a conversation about dress, that's having the cart a whole acre before the horse!!

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by JoeBandy

Soooo in the case of women inventing underwear it was ok for humans to design it because her need evolved??? Pants on a woman became most popular during WW2 when all the men were fighting and the women working in the factories to provide weapon, ammunition etc... so this evolution of the females needing something more covering in the stooping, lifting and climbing they had to do is completely wrong?

I would like to add to your post that dresses and skirts were often a work hazard around the machines and equipment involved in factory production. Many shops required ladies to wear pants for their own safety.

[JoeBandy]

Originally Posted by 1ofthechosen

Ok I know where y'all are headed. Just pull out all stops and tear down al the fences. But like a smart man once said "before you tear down a fence, find out what its there for.." Next thing you know RuPaul is going to be singing in your choir too...

All these questions you ask Joe are a catch, don't got time for trolls..

You think its a catch because you cant explain it away.... just my question. why do you ignore the rest of Exodus 28??

[Amanah]

Originally Posted by 1ofthechosen

Ok I know where y'all are headed. Just pull out all stops and tear down al the fences. But like a smart man once said "before you tear down a fence, find out what its there for.." Next thing you know RuPaul is going to be singing in your choir too...

All these questions you ask Joe are a catch, don't got time for trolls..

1ofthechosen is right about his assessment.

He is not 3rd generation OP, jaded and disillusioned, and out to tear down the faith of others.

No, he is freshly in love with Jesus, trying to defend his faith from sharks and wolves.

Run the race 1ofthechosen!, fight the good fight, keep the faith, and receive the crown of righteousness.

[JoeBandy]

Originally Posted by Amanah

Men are supposed to protect women, most women I know would rather be home caring for their families and raising their kids, not in the workforce or factories. My mother worked in a textile factory in Pennsylvania when she was a young girl and it was a hell hole.

When society breaks down everyone suffers, men, women, and children.

That's only your assessment. My mother never worked since marriage. Her sister did and still does she built a multi million dollar insurance agency she loves it! They are both in their 70's. My wife and sister both love to work. SO you are broadbrushing with your statement.

[1ofthechosen]

Originally Posted by JoeBandy

You think its a catch because you cant explain it away.... just my question. why do you ignore the rest of Exodus 28??

What your saying is ridiculous, and its not even what were talking about. All your trying to do is get someone off topic.when in society do women have to wear a ephod, or mitre.. Matter of fact you find ephod let me know.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Amanah

Men are supposed to protect women, most women I know would rather be home caring for their families and raising their kids, not in the workforce or factories. My mother worked in a textile factory in Pennsylvania when she was a young girl and it was a hell hole.

When society breaks down everyone suffers, men, women, and children.

I think many don't realize the social changes that the World Wars brought to our culture. During the wars, when women were on the home front working in factories, the women would go home or out after work and they'd continue to wear their T-shirts and pants. Some felt a degree of equality and pride in their position as they contributed to the effort. This became a part of their identity. As they began to feel more comfortable in pants, and as they began to feel more equal, along with more protection from the weather, the desire for women's pants began to increase in the market. This of course, stimulating more and more designers to look into meeting this need with a product women would purchase.

It wasn't entirely a liberal unisex movement that brought this on. It was a combination of social factors that put women in a place of having to wear pants, which led to more women preferring pants. The designers and producers were just doing what designers and producers do... creating a product to fill a demand for profit. That's, Capitalism.