Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > The Newsroom > Political Talk
Facebook

Notices

Political Talk Political News


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 06-28-2012, 04:15 PM
Pressing-On's Avatar
Pressing-On Pressing-On is offline
Not riding the train


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
Re: Supreme Court ObamaCare Ruling

Quote:
Originally Posted by Esther View Post
But if Maritial Law is declared doesn't that stop the voting?

He does have that power.
Congress can reject as well as agree to the declartion. Even if they agreed on martial law, that is not the same as military justice. The Supreme Court lays out that civil courts can still function.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 06-28-2012, 04:18 PM
Pressing-On's Avatar
Pressing-On Pressing-On is offline
Not riding the train


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
Re: Supreme Court ObamaCare Ruling

George Will has a great piece on the ruling.

Quote:
Conservatives’ consolation prize
By persuading the court to reject a Commerce Clause rationale for a president’s signature act, the conservative legal insurgency against Obamacare has won a huge victory for the long haul. This victory will help revive a venerable tradition of America’s political culture, that of viewing congressional actions with a skeptical constitutional squint, searching for congruence with the Constitution’s architecture of enumerated powers. By rejecting the Commerce Clause rationale, Thursday’s decision reaffirmed the Constitution’s foundational premise: Enumerated powers are necessarily limited because, as Chief Justice John Marshall said, “the enumeration presupposes something not enumerated.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinio...Y9V_story.html
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 06-28-2012, 04:26 PM
CC1's Avatar
CC1 CC1 is offline
Administrator


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,848
Re: Supreme Court ObamaCare Ruling

BTW did anybody have the terrible experience I did today of being at work so looking on the computer for news of the decision and seeing CNN erroneously reporting that the mandate had been struck down? CNN reported it on their website as with a "Breaking News" banner for about 10 or 15 minutes before correcting it.
__________________
"I think some people love spiritual bondage just the way some people love physical bondage. It makes them feel secure. In the end though it is not healthy for the one who is lost over it or the one who is lives under the oppression even if by their own choice"

Titus2woman on AF
F


"We did not wear uniforms. The lady workers dressed in the current fashions of the day, ...silks...satins...jewels or whatever they happened to possess. They were very smartly turned out, so that they made an impressive appearance on the streets where a large part of our work was conducted in the early years.

"It was not until long after, when former Holiness preachers had become part of us, that strict plainness of dress began to be taught.

"Although Entire Sanctification was preached at the beginning of the Movement, it was from a Wesleyan viewpoint, and had in it very little of the later Holiness Movement characteristics. Nothing was ever said about apparel, for everyone was so taken up with the Lord that mode of dress seemingly never occurred to any of us."

Quote from Ethel Goss (widow of 1st UPC Gen Supt. Howard Goss) book "The Winds of God"
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 06-28-2012, 08:06 PM
Light Light is offline
Solid 3 Stepper


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,802
Re: Supreme Court ObamaCare Ruling

Quote:
Originally Posted by CC1 View Post
BTW did anybody have the terrible experience I did today of being at work so looking on the computer for news of the decision and seeing CNN erroneously reporting that the mandate had been struck down? CNN reported it on their website as with a "Breaking News" banner for about 10 or 15 minutes before correcting it.
You left out GOP TV. (FOX) big smiles as they RUSHED to report the death of the aforadable health care act. then oh so sad faces as the TRUTH was learned.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 06-28-2012, 09:14 PM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline
Jesus' Name Pentecostal


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: near Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,805
Re: Supreme Court ObamaCare Ruling

Quote:
Originally Posted by Light View Post
You left out GOP TV. (FOX) big smiles as they RUSHED to report the death of the aforadable health care act. then oh so sad faces as the TRUTH was learned.
yes, we were watching Fox and when the first part was read about the mandate could not stand based on the commerce clause I think everyone thought that it was struck down

and then we heard the
BUT
it can stand because it is a tax and Congress has power to raise taxes
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 06-28-2012, 10:23 PM
Light Light is offline
Solid 3 Stepper


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,802
Re: Supreme Court ObamaCare Ruling

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam View Post
yes, we were watching Fox and when the first part was read about the mandate could not stand based on the commerce clause I think everyone thought that it was struck down

and then we heard the
BUT
it can stand because it is a tax and Congress has power to raise taxes
And when they heard, all those smiling faces like kids at christmas turned ash grey.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 06-28-2012, 10:28 PM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline
Jesus' Name Pentecostal


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: near Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,805
Re: Supreme Court ObamaCare Ruling

Check out this
http://whitehouse12.com/2012/06/28/c...s-is-a-genius/

Chief Justice Roberts Is A Genius

Before you look to do harm to Chief Justice Roberts or his family, it’s important that you think carefully about the meaning – the true nature — of his ruling on Obama-care. The Left will shout that they won, that Obama-care was upheld and all the rest. Let them.

It will be a short-lived celebration.

Here’s what really occurred — payback. Yes, payback for Obama’s numerous, ill-advised and childish insults directed toward SCOTUS.

Chief Justice Roberts actually ruled the mandate, relative to the commerce clause, was unconstitutional. That’s how the Democrats got Obama-care going in the first place. This is critical. His ruling means Congress can’t compel American citizens to purchase anything. Ever. The notion is now officially and forever, unconstitutional. As it should be.

Next, he stated that, because Congress doesn’t have the ability to mandate, it must, to fund Obama-care, rely on its power to tax. Therefore, the mechanism that funds Obama-care is a tax. This is also critical. Recall back during the initial Obama-care battles, the Democrats called it a penalty, Republicans called it a tax. Democrats consistently soft sold it as a penalty. It went to vote as a penalty. Obama declared endlessly, that it was not a tax, it was a penalty. But when the Democrats argued in front of the Supreme Court, they said ‘hey, a penalty or a tax, either way’. So, Roberts gave them a tax. It is now the official law of the land — beyond word-play and silly shenanigans. Obama-care is funded by tax dollars. Democrats now must defend a tax increase to justify the Obama-care law.

Finally, he struck down as unconstitutional, the Obama-care idea that the federal government can bully states into complying by yanking their existing medicaid funding. Liberals, through Obama-care, basically said to the states — ‘comply with Obama-care or we will stop existing funding.’ Roberts ruled that is a no-no. If a state takes the money, fine, the Feds can tell the state how to run a program, but if the state refuses money, the federal government can’t penalize the state by yanking other funding. Therefore, a state can decline to participate in Obama-care without penalty. This is obviously a serious problem. Are we going to have 10, 12, 25 states not participating in “national” health-care? Suddenly, it’s not national, is it?

Ultimately, Roberts supported states rights by limiting the federal government’s coercive abilities. He ruled that the government can not force the people to purchase products or services under the commerce clause and he forced liberals to have to come clean and admit that Obama-care is funded by tax increases.

Although he didn’t guarantee Romney a win, he certainly did more than his part and should be applauded.

And he did this without creating a civil war or having bricks thrown through his windshield. Oh, and he’ll be home in time for dinner.

Brilliant.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 06-28-2012, 10:29 PM
Hoovie's Avatar
Hoovie Hoovie is offline
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
Re: Supreme Court ObamaCare Ruling

Quote:
Originally Posted by deacon blues View Post
Enjoy the short term victory DM. As furious as I am over this decision, I see this in the big picture as a boon to Romney and the GOP. Just as the passage of Obamacare against popular opinion in 2010 paved the way for the massive victory of the GOP in the midterms and the emergence of the Tea Party, this decision will be pointed to, along with the flagging economy as the two main reasons why Obama was defeated in November. Watch the stock market. Watch the polls. The 50/50 dead heat stats are going to shift inRomney's favor.
yup
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005

I am a firm believer in the Old Paths

Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945

"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 06-29-2012, 06:13 AM
Nitehawk013 Nitehawk013 is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,149
Re: Supreme Court ObamaCare Ruling

I am still confused as to why people like Light and JD would celebrat ethis. Obama just got the largest middle class tax increase EVER forced down our throats!

The logic is simple. Even if the Obama admin "penalizes" companies for not carrying insurance fo rhteir employees, they won't do it. First, the penalty has no teeth. They can't jail peopel for not paying it. Second, say teh penalty is $1000 per employee not insured. Who cares? If it costs a company $5000 a year to pay for insurance for that employee, but the panalty to not cover them is only $1000...why not just pay the $1000 and pocket the rest. Then that employee is left without insurance or jumping on whatever plan the Fed provides (which is secretly what Obama wants anyways).

Once enough companies go that route, Obama will have his socialized medicine and we will be in the same spot Europe and Canada are. Months in line to get to see your regular doctor. Waiting for over 6 months for non life threatening surgeries. One man had his MRI pushed back 48 times! People leave those countries all the time to come here to get medical care because thier systems stink. Countries nearly bankrupt in part due to the INSANE cost of funding this medical mess.

Yet you lefties can't see it because you are blinded by worshipping Obama.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 06-29-2012, 06:19 AM
scotty's Avatar
scotty scotty is offline
Renewed


 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 5,432
Re: Supreme Court ObamaCare Ruling

Quote:
Originally Posted by Light View Post
And when they heard, all those smiling faces like kids at christmas turned ash grey.
yep, cause they weren't thinking fast enough. They should have thrown a party. While Obama getting re-elected was a battle, they failed to realize he threw the race himself.
__________________
You can't reach the world with your talents. People are sick and tired of religious talents. People need a Holy Ghost annointed church with real fruits to reach out and touch their lives. ~ Pastor Burrell Crabtree

In fact I think that the insinuation of "hateful" Pentecostals is coming mostly from the fertile imaginations of bitter, backslidden ex Apostolics who are constantly trying to find a way to justify their actions. ~ strait shooter


www.scottysweb.com
www.chrisscottonline.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thank GOD for our Supreme Court Jermyn Davidson Political Talk 9 06-26-2012 12:23 PM
Obamacare goes to Supreme Court Monday Pressing-On Political Talk 56 04-05-2012 12:01 PM
Obama's Supreme Court pick... Baron1710 Political Talk 88 06-16-2009 02:13 PM
Stupid Lawsuit Get Supreme Court Conference deacon blues Political Talk 14 12-05-2008 11:08 PM
Craziness in Canadian Supreme Court Pro31:28 Fellowship Hall 1 06-26-2008 06:01 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.